From: Douglas McIlroy <douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu>
To: davida@pobox.com, TUHS main list <tuhs@tuhs.org>
Subject: [TUHS] A second Unix Patent
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2023 08:28:14 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAKH6PiWkeOuvB_Y47oK7ktfxsThiPMkzp3brL47OJg3BTgtDQQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
> This one, perhaps:
> https://patents.google.com/patent/US3964059A/en
Yes, that's the Typo patent. Notice that it features "method and
apparatus". The bizarre idea of doing it in hardware was a figment of
the patent department's imagination. This was a dance to circumvent
the belief at the time that software could not be patented. Software
was smuggled in by stating that it was one way to realize the
apparatus in the patent disclosure.
The now obsolete belief was fallout from Gottsschalk v Benson, in
which the Supreme Court invalidated another Bell Labs patent, on a
trick to save a few cycles in converting integers between BCD and
binary. The grounds for rejection were roughly that software was math
(a "mental step") and therefore not patentable.
The Benson decision, written by William O. Douglas, makes ludicrous
reading: it argues, though the patent does not claim, that a patent on
this narrow method could be enforced against any program that converts
BCD to binary. Apparently Douglas thought that all black-box programs
for a given purpose were the same, although the patent office did not
so conflate different mechanical or electrical apparatuses that have a
common purpose.
Doug
next reply other threads:[~2023-03-02 13:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-03-02 13:28 Douglas McIlroy [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-03-01 22:59 Warner Losh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAKH6PiWkeOuvB_Y47oK7ktfxsThiPMkzp3brL47OJg3BTgtDQQ@mail.gmail.com \
--to=douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu \
--cc=davida@pobox.com \
--cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).