From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:146::1]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B46E275FE for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 00:09:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6938432F8; Wed, 15 May 2024 08:09:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-ot1-x32c.google.com (mail-ot1-x32c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::32c]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E46D432F7 for ; Wed, 15 May 2024 08:09:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ot1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 46e09a7af769-6f0f7ec684cso2157379a34.0 for ; Tue, 14 May 2024 15:09:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=algebras-org.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1715724540; x=1716329340; darn=tuhs.org; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+brWRAaJis0zYP6f690OdL8I2Gn60W7hbyEwbZSJFOE=; b=v6fcU8HiSgVdkYqQ65n2OgNuEqtn5JjFBXl2tp5DDYWOnfQz4/96zVdrKpn/x9UK6J u+VlbMgjlllUBLtb9BPbWNR+yNGoZ6dHn6R1/3sniFWy39nTpBt+CwWBEHlAs6KsSFf4 3siMckd6Pk5xugz83yUFWbYwGjm0iLOXitpABFtZFa98PEDBO0wNHE4s96hT8OGzrtZ0 4kwvdVcY/59o4isrdAShGWWFA+JFROWGGLRn25AyNtseQk0lTejJjAcllsT63OFmwhMy R5i4PtnT7virHXg5hpVAWl8mqaO8AgJ1a+VrasTgiqj2gei4Yt9jli3Edd7nqGxBPTJf i5zg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1715724540; x=1716329340; h=to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references:mime-version :x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=+brWRAaJis0zYP6f690OdL8I2Gn60W7hbyEwbZSJFOE=; b=J656dulhvoC4rbxskHluAJMhQOnckv2EbOhlW1EcanQ6gaUymTbr3th/1mPkARkgO9 9GuFp9GEVxPjZMJUBsP2PWsOZyRb9k9DoiOEMk9nWIlsx4AoCRPRgZxvMey3qP67UAEc KEBe+jIaCm76L8qKfzAMijMfGWyVXtl8SJZ9HdBhZR23FcPL6JMF4JuU4Bc4KoRGojNE iibfgITuKiJRySRwJpxkty/MJPqsG7rFd0TNlEOMs7scYMqQqdnK7+t7MXpmqagAM6+o GoxR3UtdjIWsRRuBteJJpSSeUa0dATdrHP7LPzY4VALlqOo+AjeKA+ZzBTqjxHLnblYX DHkg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzwfZipn1L/Lu7ZiXMiSjArD3dQNY0hMq+bjsBBP5q1IiLPWblS G1m91KYuKtnhGezmaelZA4sZLvEsHac4eE+G4YCTcuAWJoDgMRVYHtN87g79PGAUlKT/9na/2yG oCXHytmFJYDWxpnblRisxD2M9w61RhVvFOOAh1KMtEa95EP00 X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHSo5RXalBZP4LpGBdtaM6I8BYC2Z54WGqkf3PxXS7WsKDIwUWAQX9UKJB4c07JUAPNCOvZ2QN1XP8DHXZSgQw= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6870:e38a:b0:23c:357f:c475 with SMTP id 586e51a60fabf-24172e2ebb3mr16344041fac.38.1715724539958; Tue, 14 May 2024 15:08:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: George Michaelson Date: Wed, 15 May 2024 08:08:49 +1000 Message-ID: To: TUHS main list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID-Hash: S647TRB5XJWM7F4YUXQQGFJ2BCJKFQ25 X-Message-ID-Hash: S647TRB5XJWM7F4YUXQQGFJ2BCJKFQ25 X-MailFrom: ggm@algebras.org X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: If forking is bad, how about buffering? List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Maybe dd is the right place to decide how to buffer? It appears to understand thats part of it's role. I use mbuffer, and I have absolutely no idea if its proffered buffer, scatter/gather, SETSOCKOPT behaviour does or does not improve things but I use it, even though netcat exists... G