From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 27629 invoked from network); 4 Mar 2021 22:09:15 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 4 Mar 2021 22:09:15 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1362E9CA8E; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:09:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96F329CA68; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:08:58 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="bwUpnCfM"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id EEE389CA68; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:08:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-wm1-f46.google.com (mail-wm1-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E02D59CA67 for ; Fri, 5 Mar 2021 08:08:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-wm1-f46.google.com with SMTP id n22so9357385wmc.2 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:08:54 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=EpFpm44lXe7DCERLDsDAlU5H8/hoSJ48qvfoKhdhZE0=; b=bwUpnCfMcVvZnmyxM2XiPPcKhVh5spqQ9aZlshlXmGhEyptwgbmQ4JRk2RLnbtui3E uou6L03eTkExUWcwWdNZn+Uufp8KjoUFM6gdxqEVoWbLT1hMUgN1wsuJxqpU2n5f1+fn ZhuX++qh3NfjGTB/Fz40SS4+U3vs9w9FXTijYmkwgajqpwsNh7WdtLsfdjB7NadPsEBA Kf9rGTjL+QDpJNTy/UL6Ap6SdurGTyJHLaON24wZYGJl+qeq4lNcOM+0BGj3FJVq+cCx 8n3J+Wr0PUmMkP3sBzu2+74N0C3HtEGUPMC1+0KAX5HMKWerYyx/XX04pXWuLxQ82MDA EzNw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EpFpm44lXe7DCERLDsDAlU5H8/hoSJ48qvfoKhdhZE0=; b=D5k3axOptBETQqzGhhdfNEwHawBvIMjUfq+FBMx5hauGpF8A2ZbRcyXDiOs1rENEjK 1GumLKBYrA2qKIXYq8FLniHjda00ypP4FhAbNrNwqSjnFyzoHHLgrCl0MgC8I9n2pRLE B5ey1f5swL+4CksMfy1E+J8ium2Z29Zei6cgqS0HdwIoeWIsUQml5Bix+JQeJTeQ8hfM GHI6lREM9WiR78TR6KbarIc7viJZqpDdAwkhqKL8dFM/JYBXURhR0+/0VTt0h3J2Em3G 1fOFTNgCYXZgxUa9lJcVPPwAPFkD1zh1RsxGNW9dD3pQs1fbv38ZSibZ5TImUlu5yW0M r0Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530qVPfVYVlIH6ynuEjopKYXOBYZJ+ZelGGp80xOc/WC+Vj9WPNx beoz5jcgqD+eTimWEC07pTPwvssZRYE9a7ZHlIU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxeNAiLAY8SxCHjHCF7vgzh9m6Q47jrYl9fYJw6NkzbO16a7t2w+B1hyVj8QusToAXVkVpOCUS4eN+RptHKs44= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:1bc7:: with SMTP id b190mr5847969wmb.115.1614895733498; Thu, 04 Mar 2021 14:08:53 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:adf:f90f:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Mar 2021 14:08:53 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20210304212459.GA6303@eureka.lemis.com> <20210304212917.GB6303@eureka.lemis.com> From: Andy Kosela Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2021 23:08:53 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Y6cQ_YqdrLSopQja2ASJuAEpwMw Message-ID: To: "John P. Linderman" Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [TUHS] tabs vs spaces - entab, detab X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" I am still computing in full screen text mode on CRT monitors, so it's 80 columns and 8 character tab as indentation for me. It is a golden standard. >From Linux kernel coding style doc: "Tabs are 8 characters, and thus indentations are also 8 characters. There are heretic movements that try to make indentations 4 (or even 2!) characters deep, and that is akin to trying to define the value of PI to be 3." --Andy