From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 6414fa3d for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 23:35:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 607069B917; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:35:49 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0309E9B902; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:35:29 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="HFdQcsGA"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id C14529B8F9; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:35:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-lj1-f172.google.com (mail-lj1-f172.google.com [209.85.208.172]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A0F59B8FA for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 09:35:20 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-lj1-f172.google.com with SMTP id g11-v6so6805109ljk.3 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:35:20 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=0846p1IwALaHDeRwzZdDL4GWeFMmMxI1Xm8a58GFHD4=; b=HFdQcsGAC4Uzaq1MUeZwOOj7g2bdQCg45ApxRuVLqHwIsSnUW973OveaMLTl18KLqF 2GPeCy4B1LpZFT40UwaApy4Q1qX7HAPtO7oAGoq2RcOH+B5+IcZiMaCvZfEN62ZdLaML 5MlNXSLQwyUPOYoWutOXpDYu+6hDxAKfBanjHV1LUrecRSaAirgk6Md3HjGZHLW2ItOc mxhtbr2iG7SHgr3QgTzRfJodrWfslociAERHPait29XLhvoVWf/cK7U1oUDhh2JZqKKu FBnHnQKy1gB5BamdC0KkCNRHm2XCeHpYy3U3tc3fYDWGgFBY8q0ZaX8I/fR/TlfutYz7 iPDw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from :date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=0846p1IwALaHDeRwzZdDL4GWeFMmMxI1Xm8a58GFHD4=; b=GE7jvrlzIOzhrkshzhuuFQ1Up+9XTkq1FDHVMGCgoDBIrTTopeFqMbWchB0tZTUE09 KbfERPcS4NcbnKzQzsX16byZiLP23T84AXBYMA8e7JEfS9cwEjIcASC+yF8DfdQMci+p 6y9nbPCdN5ILi2aveZ7RoO0MgXqh48nEwwWfWKAZ+J/EtsJgvh5uOU6a7g/1T9GW+O9E 3epLXIwnPYpVoxJfHqKBg4ne7ag3iXJQC8GxvvZXy1Xv8h+6ZbSq8iWZQobjyZA31mzr pRy9DDX951BPrpUC598A5RVBVSk3ajsBX7K9pVXay8uror4nfB68PkKlWeMqkSYJsIqt Vc4g== X-Gm-Message-State: AHQUAubZ2KPq2WfEi+MDQB+f3uH8hQGfpDvQEOjlbpQOQeRJNsPor7Ut lSFHu48Jcl4nbvQNUeY7ITX8gFeWXHbtgJKmBAcvag== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AHgI3IZA6JcL+rWjYa10uuTAZFVi5h1ZputYaIt73tw5QCwU7aBzCiDar0Dbqbr/a3aGCAfd1TNDnRvB/xWPsJ763co= X-Received: by 2002:a2e:999a:: with SMTP id w26-v6mr3892594lji.169.1550187317974; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:35:17 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 2002:a2e:634f:0:0:0:0:0 with HTTP; Thu, 14 Feb 2019 15:35:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <20190214192940.ED58418C0AB@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> <1b71e45e-5711-ee8d-2bc8-4ea6298311dd@solar.stanford.edu> <201902142037.x1EKbpnR017241@darkstar.fourwinds.com> <33ce5850-f0b5-1fa9-d459-58d4e2416e80@telegraphics.com.au> From: Andy Kosela Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 17:35:16 -0600 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ci7mhUl_D1GtJC_-zhPSfxrqnIk Message-ID: To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000006c5b330581e31cc9" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Women in computing X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: COFF Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --0000000000006c5b330581e31cc9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Is this thread really a good place for TUHS discussion? Maybe COFF would be better suited for it. And maybe the explanation why there are more men in IT is simpler than some folks who forcefully try to create elaborate sociological theories think. In nature males are just wired differently from females. And that is why they ARE different, like 1 and 0. Otherwise they would be just one sex. And as we know nothing can come from just one number... --Andy --0000000000006c5b330581e31cc9 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <SNIP>

Is this thread really a good place for TUHS= discussion? =C2=A0 Maybe COFF would be better suited for it.
And maybe the explanation why there are more men in IT is simpl= er than some folks who forcefully try to create elaborate sociological theo= ries think.=C2=A0 In nature males are just wired differently from females.= =C2=A0 And that is why they ARE different, like 1 and 0.=C2=A0 Otherwise th= ey would be just one sex.=C2=A0 And as we know nothing can come from just o= ne number...

--Andy
--0000000000006c5b330581e31cc9--