The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: akosela@andykosela.com (Andy Kosela)
Subject: [TUHS] Illumos )
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 22:54:21 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CALMnNGiLb2T+b=+Hvt82AgYP+9rj441MztYiBKMVxLzoPJ9iqA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHYQbfA6NEk6Nsj+r7-4rP+_UHsgN+NUZTS9jZp2Byx0oQy_8A@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, Jan 5, 2015 at 11:04 AM, Jacob Ritorto <jacob.ritorto at gmail.com> wrote:
> Here's my favourite Solaris coffin nail: Oracle's last five years of
> lawnmowing, almost zero innovative milestones and clueless customer base and
> community erosion and desecration.  I do now agree that Solaris is finally
> and irredeemably dead.  Their lack of understanding and stewardship has
> tragically transitioned it from the being the definitive unix system to, in
> essence, a proprietary firmware for expensive iron.  But in the same breath
> I'd also assert that Illumos and its derivatives have taken all the good
> from it, continue to drive the fork forward in a wonderful variety of ways,
> and are the repo- and distros-of-record for this flavour of unix.

This is your way of putting history together, but I think that
objective view on the matter potray this a little bit differently.  I
personally know a lot of Fortune 500 shops still using Oracle Solaris
and happily migrating from Solaris 10 to Solaris 11, instead of
embracing Illumos and myriad of its incarnations.  You know why?

There could be only one answer -- all of those shops depend heavily on
other technologies provided by Oracle like databases and middleware,
and by sticking to one support vendor they actually save a lot.  There
is even more -- I see an increasing trend in adopting Oracle Linux in
enterprise in place of Red Hat Enterprise Linux also because of the
integration with Oracle databases and other Oracle technologies.

It is a shame that Oracle closed Solaris source, but to be honest
their integration of hardware and software is still unmatched if you
ask me.  If you take a look at their hardware and software plans they
have pretty solid plans going into 2019 for new new CPU's and Solaris
versions[1].  Their T4 and T5 chips are pretty sweet and perform
really well as compared to x86; they still also put a lot of
improvements into ZFS[2], so to say that Oracle Solaris is dead is a
gravely exaggeration.  In contrast Joyent is still just a small
start-up.  And start-up's come and go as we have seen recently with
the history of Joyent spin-off TextDrive run by Dean Allen.  I don't
see Oracle going anywhere in the next 25 years or so.

just my .02
--Andy

[1] http://www.oracle.com/us/products/servers-storage/servers/sparc/oracle-sparc/sparc-roadmap-slide-2076743.pdf
[2] https://blogs.oracle.com/darren/en_GB/entry/new_zfs_encryption_features_in



  reply	other threads:[~2015-01-06  4:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-12-31  6:22 Larry McVoy
2014-12-31  9:28 ` Wesley Parish
2014-12-31 13:13   ` John Cowan
2014-12-31 17:42     ` Diomidis Spinellis
2014-12-31 20:32       ` Clem Cole
2014-12-31 20:36         ` Larry McVoy
2014-12-31 22:19           ` Jacob Ritorto
2014-12-31 22:42             ` Larry McVoy
2014-12-31 22:50               ` Larry McVoy
2015-01-01  1:17                 ` Larry McVoy
2015-01-01  1:34                   ` Erik E. Fair
2015-01-05 12:02               ` Tim Bradshaw
2015-01-05 17:04                 ` Jacob Ritorto
2015-01-06  4:54                   ` Andy Kosela [this message]
2015-01-06 11:10                     ` Kurt H Maier
2015-01-06 15:37                   ` Tim Bradshaw
2015-01-09  9:23                     ` Jose R. Valverde
2015-01-06 21:58                   ` Clem Cole
2015-01-06 22:02                     ` [TUHS] pre-FSCK days Ronald Natalie
2015-01-07  1:53                     ` [TUHS] Illumos ) Dave Horsfall
2015-01-07 16:26                       ` Clem Cole
2015-01-07 18:32                         ` scj
2015-01-16  8:40                       ` [TUHS] sync; sync; sync; halt (was: Re: Illumos )) Tom Ivar Helbekkmo
2015-01-16 13:39                         ` random832
2015-01-16 14:14                           ` Brantley Coile
2014-12-31  9:46 ` [TUHS] Illumos ) arnold

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CALMnNGiLb2T+b=+Hvt82AgYP+9rj441MztYiBKMVxLzoPJ9iqA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=akosela@andykosela.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).