From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 16496 invoked from network); 9 May 2022 17:58:43 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 9 May 2022 17:58:43 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id E7CFE93D40; Tue, 10 May 2022 03:58:41 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 882D593D28; Tue, 10 May 2022 03:55:57 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="WCh09Mg4"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id BEE3293D28; Tue, 10 May 2022 03:55:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f42.google.com (mail-lf1-f42.google.com [209.85.167.42]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B0C493D1B for ; Tue, 10 May 2022 03:55:54 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f42.google.com with SMTP id h29so25185136lfj.2 for ; Mon, 09 May 2022 10:55:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Cyet6kQqoG7/Sq8bgzEbHwS9OjybtDe8h5x1xv8YHiU=; b=WCh09Mg4Bx0ScqhVXzOCWomtK8JUhtz6owvLCbiN62TrXzInARFveviIqCCqdVwNf2 bk1LgikIJICS5pY1o8YT6OB9qvTnhCMW7a9LWB0bsl/9IRIwyQIudoJNTqSjADePTYRV 5ffvwKVsTt74wdAlfJOCXsTwSaDubgOjiq1SdpUkcgpwSNSZsmRhsyasu1epfXY0BKel mspKSmM1hRmjoFxbKsHpzctasBE+vJTNjQyx5WXrlifDRjHHgP3Ji3ov9Rtx1tuVfjHa OEytjkP86FmoOeoNdANMDhsrDIUOAqisr6f0fYusYWvjc0pEGc9g2UOn5GnVE8+Zpz7f /vEA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Cyet6kQqoG7/Sq8bgzEbHwS9OjybtDe8h5x1xv8YHiU=; b=a/N4tmFlPpjnf1IJADc6TlZ3SSlWJL35MuIit2nFpDN7ljVfHEfJHkuyzjKzfdXbPU eYsAvJy1uHNIEAxq0huQQSDD0Kx2Zqykayx5AE3KQKE9+OW/d/d0lNEnpBz77oYoIpPB MNfVVw+6ybgF/+PFqELA+2mh98TknwE0siZ6Sq0NnBhFldIxBwqwncBr4jyLY3FK6cdl I3TA5IxDxJ08bMQ9avMZwTWacz5mBLc6Y7DHXY0UcRZTAgvBmX3TGjzQS4+GJTzNdSvL +e2lYL1Tc/+1M75GZhNwmM+O8UL8lBITaTz92CVV4aQMxvZWaLnsbEMyrYufKo3O2eyp jnKA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339aE74OkD7e/6CRPmY1B+gKcvWvSI5990/7SWMe+Ls3fafRpzL xjP3HEETS/KbRvNECBViihAiF2pnIx7lzDwl9vUrAtai X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyMszU04edtWyxhprJlVgcbEFnps9ekOuEdXB3ZHm3harb9RxhZ9qHh6QoXjJ4v+Mvi+UWxodo1FM2qghQq/Lo= X-Received: by 2002:a19:8c1a:0:b0:472:315:48db with SMTP id o26-20020a198c1a000000b00472031548dbmr13351735lfd.235.1652118952116; Mon, 09 May 2022 10:55:52 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220504020824.GA27992@minnie.tuhs.org> <20220505212630.GA19111@minnie.tuhs.org> <515f9768-9508-5e07-9fb0-186744c2d461@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <67d0b1b5-e1b1-ebb4-6ebd-aba2fbd111ee@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> In-Reply-To: <67d0b1b5-e1b1-ebb4-6ebd-aba2fbd111ee@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> From: Kenneth Goodwin Date: Mon, 9 May 2022 13:55:42 -0400 Message-ID: To: Grant Taylor Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000044879f05de97eb7e" Subject: Re: [TUHS] TUHS web server has changed X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --00000000000044879f05de97eb7e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Url rewriting That would mean supporting that forever including the overhead in contrast to the "SED modify the archive" approach is a one shot or so deal. On Mon, May 9, 2022, 12:15 PM Grant Taylor via TUHS wrote: > On 5/7/22 10:13 AM, Patrick Audley via TUHS wrote: > > When I saw this, I started to think, "I bet we can make a regexp for > that". > > :-D > > > Apparently, I do too much text processing. > > Na. I don't think so. Text processing seems to be one (of the many) > thing(s) that Unix, et al., excel at. So I think it's probably natural > for anyone well versed in Unix ... to think "RegEx"! > > > I'm up for helping process the archive if needed with sed, perl or > > some such. > > I think we're thinking about two different layers of actions. Both > using their own form of RegEx like behavior. > > It sounds like you're talking about processing / munging an mbox mail > archive. > > I'm thinking about URL re-writing in the web server, be it on the fly or > static configuration (for fixed list of old URLs). > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > --00000000000044879f05de97eb7e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Url rewriting

That would mean supporting that forever including the overhead in contras= t to the "SED modify the archive" approach is a one shot or so de= al.


=
On Mon= , May 9, 2022, 12:15 PM Grant Taylor via TUHS <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org> wrote:
On 5/7/22 10:13 AM, Patrick Audley via TUHS wrote:
> When I saw this, I started to think, "I bet we can make a regexp = for that".

:-D

> Apparently, I do too much text processing.

Na.=C2=A0 I don't think so.=C2=A0 Text processing seems to be one (of t= he many)
thing(s) that Unix, et al., excel at.=C2=A0 So I think it's probably na= tural
for anyone well versed in Unix ... to think "RegEx"!

> I'm up for helping process the archive if needed with sed, perl or=
> some such.

I think we're thinking about two different layers of actions.=C2=A0 Bot= h
using their own form of RegEx like behavior.

It sounds like you're talking about processing / munging an mbox mail <= br> archive.

I'm thinking about URL re-writing in the web server, be it on the fly o= r
static configuration (for fixed list of old URLs).



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--00000000000044879f05de97eb7e--