From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 9610 invoked from network); 6 May 2022 04:36:15 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 6 May 2022 04:36:15 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 93EF89D4A7; Fri, 6 May 2022 14:36:13 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A3469CEEF; Fri, 6 May 2022 14:32:38 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="CZL9VHzF"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 768019CEEF; Fri, 6 May 2022 14:32:35 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-lf1-f52.google.com (mail-lf1-f52.google.com [209.85.167.52]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18D919CEEE for ; Fri, 6 May 2022 14:32:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-lf1-f52.google.com with SMTP id bq30so10664813lfb.3 for ; Thu, 05 May 2022 21:32:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Mq8nv/yx37N4u2m+PkemKRkw27OHNDRg0cS4GAMGiqI=; b=CZL9VHzFktSBo80uz7svVSvjHlq1U1DG9ONuQ/2KCySd/Kc4E6Ni8OHNmmQvnM2I2w PdS0IRohs80dx535P+Ua39KOy7hssgygpVyctXBBRlaXb61YhWKKcL4Y+am8xIqHfVmq vbAJqLu9+cAvrvfHz8DHcEL7PCm9r9mmd/5iyzOI+nOmsB4lFyRhZHVrFS8PPluZfxiD yAAugKFfNqEhjWRedJXwtcIfRIfeCbADpS6s8cFUhSA3VQYemuqBcyXnIt188Q0vlv11 1s0YQYWyq+ocTgVQhRcFYSZgWcoAdMnCua1BDgIUuuAa/lj/xMKQ+xdEE/j3F27umAYm YnFw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mq8nv/yx37N4u2m+PkemKRkw27OHNDRg0cS4GAMGiqI=; b=bKYfwrIIcAlcHW4/zmRDyAI93wyP3UpCQy3TXcAiFt2mI8TXfXLwRWd2tBPhpypmIr /F1qYkYDZcExQ4czAzpvKM1ACJGzKVX5htXTOrlp+K0QZ9pFxZi+Lr/hHTES+C3Xjm7K JlRXRpzyFhPjo3xxD54cKD8998T73Y2qFU9or6MsDjtIQ5uZYO9/9YGIaVLvdUgr7jDY srWImS/OZE7mLA/atBm7ZrBBKlwyENWdK5R+0Ghy4T0tbWxXqRHjoK3cB/T5xUiJXCUx S9rXD3zR+bakWNJXUEDZLXz7Muu7zra5EMARWdQzrBSzqvt+Jx5maPlOIUZp385v6SM0 tRWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Wm3SaWYYQ7cVnxhW1YFY0BsJdd3vApTmU0j5amiSXDkD10VvF tHNaaOadmAaMxlrJqwwqNCb+Q5o1/eSKOMED3Y2RsHSy X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxW1uFjN1fQ+zQb5JS/X4EWE+cITgQx3RNnZ8N+L9dbm74WAyhGrcchy5LnAMPCDeTYkjeJgN5aExCVyf8I18o= X-Received: by 2002:a19:8c1a:0:b0:472:315:48db with SMTP id o26-20020a198c1a000000b00472031548dbmr1163281lfd.235.1651811550931; Thu, 05 May 2022 21:32:30 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20220504020824.GA27992@minnie.tuhs.org> <20220505212630.GA19111@minnie.tuhs.org> <515f9768-9508-5e07-9fb0-186744c2d461@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> In-Reply-To: <515f9768-9508-5e07-9fb0-186744c2d461@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> From: Kenneth Goodwin Date: Fri, 6 May 2022 00:32:20 -0400 Message-ID: To: Grant Taylor Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000baafeb05de505828" Subject: Re: [TUHS] TUHS web server has changed X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000baafeb05de505828 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Pardon my ignorance as I am not familiar with mailman and its storage format but I assume that running the mailbox through a Sed filter to change Minnie to newmin would not work??? Minnie and newmin are the same length. Any size data would therefore presumably remain valid. This assumes the mail archive is text based for the most part. Just thinking out loud.... On Thu, May 5, 2022, 10:41 PM Grant Taylor via TUHS wrote: > On 5/5/22 3:26 PM, Warren Toomey via TUHS wrote: > > Yes, I plan on moving to Mailman 3.x. I'm hoping that I can import > > the raw TUHS mbox (currently 130Mbytes). This, unfortunately, > > will break the hyperlinks in the current mail archive > > athttps://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/ > > Let's chat about this when the time comes. > > I strongly suspect there is a way to retain functionality for the old > links, even if they are simply redirects to the new location. -- I have > some ideas. }:-) > > > > -- > Grant. . . . > unix || die > > --000000000000baafeb05de505828 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Pardon my ignorance as I am not familiar with mailman and= its storage format but I assume that running the mailbox through a Sed fil= ter to change Minnie to newmin would not work???=C2=A0 Minnie and newmin ar= e the same length. Any size data would therefore presumably remain valid. T= his assumes the mail archive is text based for the most part.

Just thinking out loud....

<= div class=3D"gmail_quote">
On Thu, May= 5, 2022, 10:41 PM Grant Taylor via TUHS <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org> wrote:
On 5/5/22 3:26 PM, Warren Toomey via TUHS wrote:
> Yes, I plan on moving to Mailman 3.x. I'm hoping that I can import=
> the raw TUHS mbox (currently 130Mbytes). This, unfortunately,
> will break the hyperlinks in the current mail archive
> athttps://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/<= br>
Let's chat about this when the time comes.

I strongly suspect there is a way to retain functionality for the old
links, even if they are simply redirects to the new location.=C2=A0 -- I ha= ve
some ideas.=C2=A0 }:-)



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--000000000000baafeb05de505828--