From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id f809d206 for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 02:53:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 8AD6B9B783; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:53:06 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67C1494BCD; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:52:35 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="Kz2yKvtu"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 743A794BCD; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:52:33 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f171.google.com (mail-qt1-f171.google.com [209.85.160.171]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C933A94BBA for ; Fri, 12 Jul 2019 12:52:32 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f171.google.com with SMTP id a15so6648684qtn.7 for ; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:52:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=F5wN0z1jUYj85oAEEeF5KubvyfgYhktU907qOwKWDNQ=; b=Kz2yKvtu4y1YB8rC24jRJTHU8YiflbbnXVoegIvJZCRINbgTsEJqznlaID/B28qd7w rJqrbRaGSgANNcRg9Nwe0YzsdkxLV8GuRhmDXRpIeIA/liOyaqN3QpkglLCRRtZbNUUV LCmFdvQpX2A9MIlrUIXQu77g4B9434htwdJTu8c9TuTWWDkkihJ71cshJiB/d4gwO/gJ jKslMQ3W0DJGj9w/xyIZ4e5SzOz/K1WirYdnuQzq3D6yVPZoBiQ5ecO2jodSiQqF/fN1 /keYiXqwR3zd1AAZfLikwQEknwXZkZ3viID28VsUJhXpMH2Wjx7+JCXeb6UAmqKiEGAs f/wg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=F5wN0z1jUYj85oAEEeF5KubvyfgYhktU907qOwKWDNQ=; b=qp9GMdWumFEy/pgYq8tPB1LF2pohIrf9FmnYboQjegx+GR148LY2WnKiJSccnUuO6D 6AdNWDkoZw8v/WASORiPX/dp8gItcE024BiQgXk8vP7RurM3DVlXz+T2layyDWdfKF/q NfHgFetuDWSsa72i00WzH/1XORP/JmTqdSG4p+nKkYpmdobV7NrB3NtIMXleras5ssWF /8z28MQMV+WNljfjB9xf+/J6Mq2cLM30z/d97nM6B5KLYhiexXg6yGVHJ07P3GfoHoFL f0uuJCmC4ormbZtv+JBJ3Rb71jCw9BqZUwP/vmPlb2HXkhiXF1++BPlZfuP+bdjqHrBt Wgdw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAWLXbhmtsh5e8Zya8KDxBbTnE27DgmSD9uj/PrpqnmrNGaSDn7E 0uTjHhITo0/GZYeN+zQqSPAYtJDDFI/f0DRrGgg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz+UqQYVtyISkIw2fv4lQ71ZiAR3pX4kLykB2LKeVhvaK/Nhk4Tuk56wno9aVAAOlQicTrv/anUPo/D379iRys= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:140a:: with SMTP id k10mr4464932qtj.175.1562899951776; Thu, 11 Jul 2019 19:52:31 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <27f401d53834$51101140$f33033c0$@ronnatalie.com> In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Thu, 11 Jul 2019 20:52:19 -0600 Message-ID: To: Dave Horsfall Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000720e59058d730042" Subject: Re: [TUHS] Interactive Systems (was Pcc for 386) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000720e59058d730042 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 4:31 PM Dave Horsfall wrote: > On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, ron@ronnatalie.com wrote: > > > Interactive Systems. Now there=E2=80=99s a name I=E2=80=99ve not hear= d in many a > > year. Heinz Lycklama went there. > > A blast from the past indeed. > > > The did a couple of things, a straight UNIX port to various things > > (PDP-11, 386) and also there =E2=80=9CUNIX running under VMS=E2=80=9D p= roduct. > > Which model of the PDP-11? I did ports of V6.5 (as I called it) to the > 11/34, 11/23, and 11/60, all of which had their oddities. > > And that wouldn't be Eunice, would it? Or was that purely a DEC product? > Eunice came from Stanford and was sold by the Wollongong group, both as a standalone thing, or as the TCP/IP subset... I'm unsure if others licensed it or not (TGV did the TCP part, iirc, but enhanced it way more than TWG did). Warner > --000000000000720e59058d730042 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Thu, Jul 11, 2019, 4:31 PM Dave Horsfall &= lt;dave@horsfall.org> wrote:
On Thu, 11 Jul 2019, ron@ronnatalie.c= om wrote:

> Interactive Systems.=C2=A0=C2=A0 Now there=E2=80=99s a name I=E2=80=99= ve not heard in many a
> year.=C2=A0 Heinz Lycklama went there.

A blast from the past indeed.

> The did a couple of things, a straight UNIX port to various things > (PDP-11, 386) and also there =E2=80=9CUNIX running under VMS=E2=80=9D = product.

Which model of the PDP-11?=C2=A0 I did ports of V6.5 (as I called it) to th= e
11/34, 11/23, and 11/60, all of which had their oddities.

And that wouldn't be Eunice, would it?=C2=A0 Or was that purely a DEC p= roduct?

Eunice came from Stanford and was sold by the Wollongong group, both as a = standalone thing, or as the TCP/IP subset... I'm unsure if others licen= sed it or not (TGV did the TCP part, iirc, but enhanced it way more than TW= G did).

Warner
--000000000000720e59058d730042--