The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: imp@bsdimp.com (Warner Losh)
Subject: [TUHS] Unix with TCP/IP for small PDP-11s
Date: Sat, 20 May 2017 15:05:29 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANCZdfo-oaupKxY4yUWhL-dKwaBkTSTiz=JkJ8K3XfZq180yMQ@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f788e1e9-3f55-cdb4-ac39-a7bb9992e62e@update.uu.se>

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 2:40 PM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at update.uu.se> wrote:

> On 2017-05-20 20:18, Warner Losh wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 4:46 AM, Johnny Billquist <bqt at update.uu.se
>> <mailto:bqt at update.uu.se>> wrote:
>>
>>     On 2017-05-20 04:00, Warner Losh <imp at bsdimp.com
>>     <mailto:imp at bsdimp.com>> wrote:
>>
>>         https://ia601901.us.archive.org/10/items/bitsavers_decpdp11u
>> lLTRIX112.0SPDSep84_870730/AE-X370C-TC_ULTRIX-11_2.0SPD_Sep84.pdf
>>         <https://ia601901.us.archive.org/10/items/bitsavers_decpdp11
>> ulLTRIX112.0SPDSep84_870730/AE-X370C-TC_ULTRIX-11_2.0SPD_Sep84.pdf>
>>
>>         Looks like it requires MMU, but not split I/D space as it lists
>> the
>>         following as compatible: M11, 11/23+, 11/24, 11/34, 11/40 and
>>         11/60. It
>>         does require 256kb of memory. See table 2, page 6 for details.
>>
>>
>>
>>     Uh...? Where do you see that there is any TCP/IP support in
>>     Ultrix-11? If any was done by someone else, there is no saying that
>>     it would be usable on a machine without split I/D. To be honest,
>>     I've never seen any mention of TCP/IP on any machine without split
>>     I/D space. I guess it could be done, but it would be a rather big
>>     headache...
>>
>>
>> I read the sources to see the TCP/IP support was there (that's the bit
>> about adding Berkeley Sockets). I see nowhere that it's excluded for the
>> non I/D machines, but haven't tried it first hand. I got interested not
>> because of the PDP-11, but because I have an old Rainbow that recently
>> started running Venix (v7-based version) and was trolling around for
>> some way to do TCP/IP to it (though w/o readily available ethernet
>> cards, I'm not sure it is a viable project).
>>
>
> You do know that the Rainbow is not a PDP-11, right?


Only since '84 when I bought mine... They are both small memory boxes,
though, and something that can run in a 256kB machine should be able to run
on a 892kB machine...  I have bits of mch.c/low.s from Venix that I can
leverage for the port to the Ultrix kernel to the 8088 that's inside the
Rainbow it would be running on.

Warner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://minnie.tuhs.org/pipermail/tuhs/attachments/20170520/4fe0cc15/attachment.html>


  reply	other threads:[~2017-05-20 21:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <mailman.1.1495245601.20449.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2017-05-20 10:46 ` Johnny Billquist
2017-05-20 17:39   ` Henry Bent
2017-05-20 20:40     ` Johnny Billquist
2017-05-20 20:44       ` Henry Bent
2017-05-20 18:18   ` Warner Losh
2017-05-20 19:05     ` arnold
2017-05-20 20:29       ` Warner Losh
2017-05-20 21:41       ` David Arnold
2017-05-20 21:59         ` Erik E. Fair
2017-05-20 20:40     ` Johnny Billquist
2017-05-20 21:05       ` Warner Losh [this message]
2017-05-20 21:34         ` Johnny Billquist
2017-05-21  5:13           ` Random832
2017-05-21 11:04             ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-24 15:21 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-24 17:19 ` Jeremy C. Reed
     [not found] <mailman.1.1495591202.25149.tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
2017-05-24  9:20 ` Paul Ruizendaal
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2017-05-23 13:43 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-23 11:35 Paul Ruizendaal
2017-05-23  1:33 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-23  1:14 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-22  9:28 Paul Ruizendaal
2017-05-22 14:09 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-22 14:51   ` Steve Simon
2017-05-22 16:29     ` Clem Cole
2017-05-22 16:35       ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-22 22:07       ` Paul Ruizendaal
2017-05-22 23:25         ` Clem Cole
2017-05-23  0:36           ` Paul Ruizendaal
2017-05-19 15:15 Noel Chiappa
2017-05-19 16:29 ` Henry Bent
2017-05-19 19:04   ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-20  0:15     ` Warner Losh
2017-05-20  0:21       ` Warner Losh
2017-05-19 17:39 ` Clem Cole
2017-05-21 16:16   ` Dave Horsfall
2017-05-21 19:58     ` Clem Cole
2017-05-21 20:57       ` Ron Natalie
2017-05-21 21:26         ` Clem Cole
2017-05-21 21:46         ` William Pechter

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CANCZdfo-oaupKxY4yUWhL-dKwaBkTSTiz=JkJ8K3XfZq180yMQ@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=imp@bsdimp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).