From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1c30b738 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 20:56:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9E6EB94BFD; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:56:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CEDBB94BEB; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:55:30 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="au2B6xhE"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7C1DA94BEB; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:55:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f169.google.com (mail-qk1-f169.google.com [209.85.222.169]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D751194BEA for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 06:55:27 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f169.google.com with SMTP id c189so620297qke.6 for ; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:55:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=VAlFWA+HXTeLrxM+6/otVzNiE6CDlLAFJcGW2HvpgEk=; b=au2B6xhECbPU38tSCo5/DoKOFDL7O5MffyeOdKio+4ktw1yT/7rO0eyuGbepIBmvmP 7vWKIxi7HFEt/OJX0fOVZPtOyEGQWDLp3EutHvhofltxMFTZ4roS7qiCnPIwuN1oWXlM 1UvOqegpsRYHdJnu4yeA+THBNH1MwlYC2A0w1w7IptAue0VTOhnKAMNLSKmNevu9DC4j Te9n+Xonr0f49JR8du6mgGoG1Cba8JhndXzKEo6Zqsm+aD37Ol/C7H0UWKjN82pp3Sqx 5q2Om8FyVASuXI6j0tTt34ut3wIazX+3jP3o6CqVXsDInbFP016T/Gk06tmCOjEwVn8Y 5QjA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=VAlFWA+HXTeLrxM+6/otVzNiE6CDlLAFJcGW2HvpgEk=; b=ZHZLmnbjP1qJJUTio8EH3D2GTKG/y60++tkP2DV2jzxyvdGbqYrfbW2ZfqOnX9EWGt cJDfcVPt+m7V1aLMH/qQFAS9NtRdAqr/0A5ITvTLJLBzVcE0zy1AX1rH3+zQPXh/ucBZ NvaXH2ajN4+FbteCaQQQqp2BXBjUxSNrhLor+vHmkW9mIFWn5F8wf1sOFvI7kITWSEqE HYYxHINT/iTFXdM+kiYGr7d6RxLoKd5t6ygd3gybxJRpp+BjdSOdi1zV0g7/qwEoiv4A NI7OYEm4RnLEeATpqLkhIt1TMrc5sdwERqWyhbPt5mvYPanm/zNSlzomMm7/BHtKDOw1 fjNQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUZRDHckoAn+HIE+OFXjjfl5UwbQuOCu1+CJWhBiYqv0hnbaSuj mdz121I6H/UO+RwfIi7fAgop1erZs2rdI2Nyu8Q7KGV5v+0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzBmZJAOpLNPlH6UqIpbdflG82BgzK/u3sPD3hJEz7IOlA3V3DXaw4sMuWW/S0VCiazF5DRm5QfLsDvLllLpVw= X-Received: by 2002:ae9:e702:: with SMTP id m2mr22664192qka.279.1552251326805; Sun, 10 Mar 2019 13:55:26 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <201903100731.x2A7VZJF033832@ducky.net> <7wpnqzj7tr.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> In-Reply-To: <7wpnqzj7tr.fsf@junk.nocrew.org> From: Warner Losh Date: Sun, 10 Mar 2019 14:55:15 -0600 Message-ID: To: Lars Brinkhoff Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000efcfb70583c3ac76" Subject: Re: [TUHS] a possible source for 4.1BSD tapes X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Unix Heritage Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --000000000000efcfb70583c3ac76 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 5:49 AM Lars Brinkhoff wrote: > Nigel Williams wrote: > > Mike Haertel wrote: > >> Also, while poking around the net, I've found a number of purported > >> tape images of 4.1BSD dated 7/10/1981 that look to me to a little > sketchy > > http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/bits/UCB_CSRG/4.1_BSD_19810710.zip > > That's what I have been using for testing the MIT Chaosnet patches. > If it's no good, I'd like to know. > There's also http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/bits/BSD/BSD4.1_bootable.tap.gz which I just noticed... Warner --000000000000efcfb70583c3ac76 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


On Sun, Mar 10, 2019 at 5:49 AM Lars Brinkhoff <lars@nocrew.org> wrote:
Nigel Williams wrote:
> Mike Haertel wrote:
>> Also, while poking around the net, I've found a number of purp= orted
>> tape images of 4.1BSD dated 7/10/1981 that look to me to a little = sketchy
> http://bitsavers.trailing-= edge.com/bits/UCB_CSRG/4.1_BSD_19810710.zip

That's what I have been using for testing the MIT Chaosnet patches.
If it's no good, I'd like to know.

<= div>There's also http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/bits/BSD/BSD4.1= _bootable.tap.gz which I just noticed...

Warne= r
--000000000000efcfb70583c3ac76--