From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: imp@bsdimp.com (Warner Losh) Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2018 04:27:59 +0000 Subject: [TUHS] long lived programs In-Reply-To: <1522980220.3263789.1328338032.3CD6D7F7@webmail.messagingengine.com> References: <1522962186.9871.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org> <3D0656AE-2164-468B-8C98-578F8B2F16EA@bitblocks.com> <1522980220.3263789.1328338032.3CD6D7F7@webmail.messagingengine.com> Message-ID: On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, 8:04 PM Random832 wrote: > On Thu, Apr 5, 2018, at 17:38, Bakul Shah wrote: > > May be case itself is such a historical artifact? AFAIK all non-roman > > scripts are without case distinction. > > Greek and Cyrillic both have cases. And the Hiragana/Katakana distinction > in Japanese is similar to case in some ways (including limited computer > systems using only one) > Really? Those must be quite old as everything I've seen has both. But the difference between kata and kana is much larger than upper and lower case. It is rare to convert one to another as they are used to write different things. Only to look things up in a dictionary would you convert, and then you'd also be converting kanji to... In Roman languages, very little is changed with all caps, though a few things become ambiguous depending on the language... In Japanese, it could turn some foreign loan word into a native word with a totally different meaning... Warner > Full list of scripts in unicode that have case distinctions (based on > analyzing character names): Adlam, Armenian, Cherokee, Coptic, Cyrillic, > Deseret, Georgian, Glagolitic, Greek, Latin, Old Hungarian, Osage, and > Warang Citi. > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: