The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
To: Alan Coopersmith <alan.coopersmith@oracle.com>
Cc: Marc Rochkind <mrochkind@gmail.com>, tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: ANSI (C) vs IEEE (POSIX) Standards Body Selection
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:28:59 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CANCZdfpSPE0yhgyFch4JDUC1JW17V4pz7cZ2aGpDk+chsY93ig@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e947133d-cfd0-42e8-9e9a-aa4e3c3f71af@oracle.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3107 bytes --]

I'll add that POSIX, as we know it today (and really since at least 2000)
is a collaboration between The Open Group, IEEE Std 1003.1-XXXX and ISO/IEC
9945:YYYY (collectively known as the Austin Group, though why "Austin" I
cannot say).

So these days, it's standardized by "both" IEEE and ANSI (in the form of
ISO, of which ANSI is effectively a member).

Warner

On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 3:20 PM Alan Coopersmith via TUHS <tuhs@tuhs.org>
wrote:

> On 6/26/24 13:29, Marc Rochkind wrote:
> > The standards effort I was involved in was part of the now-forgotten (I
> hope)
> > GUI Wars, in which a bunch of workstation makers (I remember DEC, HP,
> and IBM,
> > among others) supporting an X Window System GUI toolkit called Motif
> battled Sun
> > and AT&T who pushed OpenLook. OpenLook was about 50 times more elegant,
> but
> > Motif won the day. It came from OSF, the Open Systems Foundation, which
> was
> > easily the most arrogant organization I ever dealt with. I think they
> were
> > disbanded as a result of a lawsuit involving restraint of trade, or
> monopolistic
> > behavior, or a cartel, or something along those lines.
>
> OSF merged with X/Open to become The Open Group, though the lawsuit you
> mention
> is described in the History section of
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Open_Software_Foundation .
>
> > I think the
> > Motif folks managed at one point to get their own standards committee. I
> know
> > that our effort fizzled. I don't know if there ever was a Motif standard.
>
> After the merger, Motif was included, along with CDE and the X Window
> System,
> as part of The Open Group's "Unix 98 Workstation" standard.  Later versions
> of the Unix standards dropped the GUI components altogether.
>
> > Motif, like X, was easily used by anyone who was an MIT CS grad student.
> > OpenLook might have been used by Sun Workstation programmers, but I
> don't know
> > if it ever appeared on any other system.
>
> At least the Xview library and olvm window manager were released as open
> source,
> and were available on some early Linux distros.  Some other applications
> are
> still available from either https://www.darwinsys.com/olcd/ or
> https://github.com/IanDarwin/OpenLookCDROM .
>

I'm saddened that I was never able to get Object Interface (OI) sources
released,
since it implemented both Motif and OpenLook (2d and 3d) in C++. and UIB
(User Interface Builder).
But instead we were purchased by too many companies that later just
abandoned everything.
It was my little hedge against the Unix Wars, and porting it to all the
Unixes showed me
both how close everything was, and how annoyingly different things were. I
kinda had my
own 'portability library' that I'd conditionally compile in things for the
outlier Unix systems of
the day (usually HP/UX and AIX, though IRIX was oddly both more advanced
and missing
bits).

Warner


> --
>          -Alan Coopersmith-                 alan.coopersmith@oracle.com
>           Oracle Solaris Engineering - https://blogs.oracle.com/solaris
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4282 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-06-26 21:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-26 17:56 [TUHS] " segaloco via TUHS
2024-06-26 18:32 ` [TUHS] " Ori Idan
2024-06-26 18:42   ` Marc Rochkind
2024-06-26 20:07   ` Aron Insinga
2024-06-26 23:28   ` Peter Yardley
2024-06-26 18:35 ` Marc Rochkind
2024-06-26 18:43   ` James Johnston
2024-06-26 18:52     ` segaloco via TUHS
2024-06-26 19:34       ` Heinz Lycklama
2024-06-26 20:01         ` Charles H Sauer (he/him)
2024-06-27  2:36           ` [TUHS] Re: arithmetic, " John Levine
2024-06-27  3:41             ` Charles H. Sauer
2024-06-26 20:29         ` [TUHS] " Marc Rochkind
2024-06-26 21:17           ` Rich Salz
2024-06-26 21:20           ` Alan Coopersmith via TUHS
2024-06-26 21:28             ` Warner Losh [this message]
2024-06-26 21:49               ` Rich Salz
2024-06-26 21:53               ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2024-06-27  0:44                 ` Clem Cole
2024-06-27  1:11                   ` [TUHS] Origin of the name POSIX (was: ANSI (C) vs IEEE (POSIX) Standards Body Selection) Greg 'groggy' Lehey
2024-06-27  2:12                     ` [TUHS] " Ron Natalie
2024-06-27  2:37                       ` Warner Losh
2024-06-27 14:19                       ` Steffen Nurpmeso
     [not found]                     ` <CAC20D2M+75ohjTPcTBmBkejeaWjQQjWCkf=4ZYrP4Bk0MCamKA@mail.gmail.com>
2024-06-27  3:02                       ` Clem Cole
2024-06-27  3:03                         ` Clem Cole
2024-06-27  3:08                         ` Clem Cole
2024-06-27  8:20                     ` Eric E. Bowles via TUHS
2024-06-27 11:56                       ` John S Quarterman
     [not found]                         ` <CAEoi9W4ZSVCVsJJ8pdBuBobeeXOkwsey0kM6DWBnPiuSd_7TQA@mail.gmail.com>
     [not found]                           ` <CANCZdfoghuf4n=HDgRJXDJ5VqZ=rCtmq_0WadaR6kj8QmcoVQQ@mail.gmail.com>
2024-06-27 13:42                             ` John S Quarterman
2024-06-27 11:58                     ` Dan Cross
2024-06-27 14:34                       ` Clem Cole
2024-06-27 15:05                         ` [TUHS] Re: Origin of the name POSIX Heinz Lycklama
2024-06-27 13:57                   ` [TUHS] Re: ANSI (C) vs IEEE (POSIX) Standards Body Selection Steffen Nurpmeso
2024-06-27 14:22                   ` Chet Ramey via TUHS
2024-06-27 14:29                     ` Andy Kosela
2024-06-27 14:59                       ` Clem Cole
2024-06-27  4:12             ` Wesley Parish
2024-06-27  4:52             ` G. Branden Robinson
2024-06-26 19:47     ` Aron Insinga
2024-06-27  5:02       ` Nevin Liber
2024-06-26 20:36   ` Stuff Received
2024-06-26 22:33     ` James Johnston
2024-06-26 20:32 ` Clem Cole
2024-06-26 22:04   ` Heinz Lycklama

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CANCZdfpSPE0yhgyFch4JDUC1JW17V4pz7cZ2aGpDk+chsY93ig@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=imp@bsdimp.com \
    --cc=alan.coopersmith@oracle.com \
    --cc=mrochkind@gmail.com \
    --cc=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).