From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0e8a7083 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 14:47:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 4D32FA1F03; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:47:18 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E98C3A1EDD; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:46:31 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b=ttjA0wtF; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 476EBA1A64; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:46:28 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-io0-f178.google.com (mail-io0-f178.google.com [209.85.223.178]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D3117A1EFC for ; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 00:46:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-io0-f178.google.com with SMTP id l14-v6so4704839iob.7 for ; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 07:46:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Tn794GIhNqDK3IRCEfNPZuLgwdQaWmsur/YtayxGCv8=; b=ttjA0wtFs5utYXKIpTpUAfKoQiIN+DbTdbJmkNLLYnyzQRNzO5pmJ4LqBTv8QLscEk 9i0XOpQZUaUbBc+FpU9t0rL4VcuGjoHrraLxXneMwUtxBRsIxo51VU2uQXLGM3yWB8gj ZDV6qFrx1YH4y/Kkd3UMzhsZhLpuUYkx2uhtx0Ua/ubE0h0S0NEwSk1xDd9f4X7RgLWM 6AK1cru1MebeavlO6OHNAGiTf3cHR3Yy8gnRhsDgVwSj9BDM0rk8DpivwW2FoT7ZH1ak KRCWittTGCg+x6sbLFLf2bsHL7QEKvS9GD0sjHzieKsXB4bUXqMIqLY6AZ/rOjtU7OkZ /wrA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tn794GIhNqDK3IRCEfNPZuLgwdQaWmsur/YtayxGCv8=; b=WDQkUIx+B/2sXJLh//hdjx/eydCK3VMnWZs4iPU5v2MiLHnZBeTewnFN62Ww+daTan UeO4Qxe7RGVe2hEGcIzU6XG4pM8ycCsa6/mAknNyddRn9EVYa+PYVn6wr7cDN6D8S7kk V5K9P94XyNl5g8FfoyQVqE6nDyDvy/BtV20WDOMHZIcY837li1tW5yeF9/w8Ht9ld1IQ r6xcsm5C8PXrnzzaSd9mr+1KQs0f33yaWvaX85L6ANJeXfWhVJad6ApGsxRUDxKy3HrK a8Cb7M67gavGXXuAmtXZFBU8aCzgVI17nSSuJafQ5sdQRmNRPOYYtJvlokkInxSuddw+ QUIw== X-Gm-Message-State: APzg51CQY1QOCprU68h2Q53yiDffJumViNgEDu/DzJo5SDM0u+yJOWbl D6CoLK6Jj3iU5wc5NuIFqHuhyNab1CyBtr1HCgSdjg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ANB0VdZP4Oi9Ugw80AZgddzVPRFBY8POkGKMV6kaFOAEyPTrkp1JkIxMUKss6l7NK5bqwetjUjbxs+1jfbxcvwdHgQo= X-Received: by 2002:a6b:d004:: with SMTP id x4-v6mr5284672ioa.299.1535553976135; Wed, 29 Aug 2018 07:46:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20180828003057.GA317@mcvoy.com> <201808280601.w7S61oLM030628@freefriends.org> <20180829004627.GG317@mcvoy.com> <201808290529.w7T5TFKa006049@freefriends.org> <20180829144037.GO317@mcvoy.com> In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 08:46:04 -0600 Message-ID: To: pechter@gmail.com Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000048004e05749405af" Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --00000000000048004e05749405af Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" They didn't release the sources to Solaris 11. Anything released prior, though, remains free. Warner On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 8:44 AM William Pechter wrote: > Didn't they un-open Solaris 11? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Cross > To: Larry McVoy > Cc: TUHS main list > Sent: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:42 > Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code? > > I wonder if they would consider doing it now. Oracle, I mean; the Solaris > code was opened up and an argument could be made that SunOS would be useful > for historical examination. > > On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:41 AM Larry McVoy wrote: > > > Sun never open sourced it. > > > > On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:29:15PM -0600, arnold@skeeve.com wrote: > > > Changed the subject line. > > > > > > Larry McVoy wrote: > > > > > > > So I'd go with MacOS is not a fun kernel. It's pretty close to BSD > > > > and I recently wandered through that VM system and I was not > impressed. > > > > I wish like hell that Sun had fed their VM back to BSD. Yeah, it > > wasn't > > > > multi processor friendly but someone would have fixed that. > > > > > > > > The penguin stuff, it's OK. Not as clean as SunOS by a long shot. > > > > > > So, is the SunOS code available in a way that would let people hack > > > on it? They had ported it to 386 (roadrunner?), so maybe it'd be > > > possible to revive it and bring it into the 21st century. > > > > > > Just a thought, > > > > > > Arnold > > > > -- > > --- > > Larry McVoy lm at mcvoy.com > > http://www.mcvoy.com/lm > > > --00000000000048004e05749405af Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
They didn't release the sources to Solaris 11. Anythin= g released prior, though, remains free.

Warner

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 8:44 AM W= illiam Pechter <pechter@gmail.com> wrote:
Didn't they un-op= en Solaris 11?

-----Original Message-----
From: Dan Cross <c= rossd@gmail.com>
To: Larry McVoy <lm@mc= voy.com>
Cc: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>
Sent: Wed, 29 Aug 2018 10:42
Subject: Re: [TUHS] SunOS code?

I wonder if they would consider doing it now. Oracle, I mean; the Solaris code was opened up and an argument could be made that SunOS would be useful=
for historical examination.

On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:41 AM Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com> wrote:

> Sun never open sourced it.
>
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2018 at 11:29:15PM -0600, arnold@skeeve.com wrote:
> > Changed the subject line.
> >
> > Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com> wrote:
> >
> > > So I'd go with MacOS is not a fun kernel.=C2=A0 It's= pretty close to BSD
> > > and I recently wandered through that VM system and I was not= impressed.
> > > I wish like hell that Sun had fed their VM back to BSD.=C2= =A0 Yeah, it
> wasn't
> > > multi processor friendly but someone would have fixed that.<= br> > > >
> > > The penguin stuff, it's OK.=C2=A0 Not as clean as SunOS = by a long shot.
> >
> > So, is the SunOS code available in a way that would let people ha= ck
> > on it? They had ported it to 386 (roadrunner?), so maybe it'd= be
> > possible to revive it and bring it into the 21st century.
> >
> > Just a thought,
> >
> > Arnold
>
> --
> ---
> Larry McVoy=C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2= =A0 lm at mcvoy.com
> http://www.mcvoy.com/lm
>
--00000000000048004e05749405af--