From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 24821 invoked from network); 7 Aug 2020 20:18:50 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 7 Aug 2020 20:18:50 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id D80F99CAAD; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 06:18:47 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 527799CAB0; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 06:18:20 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="wxEqEiKm"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 99CF39C1CE; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 06:18:05 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qk1-f172.google.com (mail-qk1-f172.google.com [209.85.222.172]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C89F99C1C7 for ; Sat, 8 Aug 2020 06:18:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qk1-f172.google.com with SMTP id 77so2886006qkm.5 for ; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 13:18:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=DW2asnV+pfvVmqrwjF5mfq7Ke7v/onAJrLou4eXJ260=; b=wxEqEiKm0tSb84O4oOKDYwVb31FEqVTjK5WKuwulyPXZ4FXu3hcK8kprbyoNDKqeOF 4Fkk23LQYs+sl8h3p06JXTHi6c9pbC8TEcgrkydJXwBAqpdgmImAr/m0LIfqDfqS3n/C cQ0BHCtocnbcVEzKkJmd3zsF+SA95l1hC2bFUe97e8mwaZ6/qtemrOvxUv6AG8izJkec 3D4jKsJ7Fy0izN/dQG/m5hl+825NIuGfbCyaN+hWa1VREoI/xVx8hZP2Zj6X55xMcI7b 4A6GHyZzGm+D4IIV9A+D1/2b9jZn1lRk4ox8GxxLPpnzZ1WnEtfScHMwWignI0S+hbbA EkRw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=DW2asnV+pfvVmqrwjF5mfq7Ke7v/onAJrLou4eXJ260=; b=s2nEwS+bbghPtd1t+ATliJxIxrBi05HIQzO9RO9z5AsN4lvk4RfBHnai7G3GQzbjmo /Bc5EwQKjObafHZGBSdYux9Z5NLkYBwn6XWKslBMgSZrngO3iiPXQIF6yFOPFDFp9/fj CdfQab67zUlFiWILxIlsI6s/z33gAr+l7rIS1uIs2jlZNQmueWEr9SAUt7bR2fhjP/b/ O4C26BYgPuA/Y1z21Owj+lrKtl56a8GD5EWyxWvhOaYR8NNxU2kCLhJT4P4ix/3sWZjP IrqUD2Dp0MNQxqdM5P+NQapIhOgxbPeBBZvdAbMcrvaYYSGnDBNYWz2Q+ofympcqvggb S3dg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532eB0mcDYXHZTqDpgSoiMSy8E98StRsT2uNgEfKtabiIbTiOh+E khsPZR/fEgUsHVamINXdPlOk8Tm9FNSrUCxofqZZCDW/ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzEesw792aU6QXMpLKxeN1XAVWFoxCx2QViQCaI1oMLdxQZYSfKozrl4q4mvVxSIObp1qdm9369T1+xwMnS2Jg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:620a:110d:: with SMTP id o13mr15570046qkk.60.1596831483773; Fri, 07 Aug 2020 13:18:03 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Warner Losh Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2020 14:17:52 -0600 Message-ID: To: John Cowan Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000005bc82205ac4f4dbf" Subject: Re: [TUHS] [COFF] Unix and SW Releases (was V7 et al from Will) X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Computer Old Farts Followers , TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --0000000000005bc82205ac4f4dbf Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:27 AM John Cowan wrote: > Broadly yes. 2BSD was for the PDP-11, and while it could probably have > been ported to another 16-bit box, I don't think that was ever done by > anyone. > I'm not aware of any 16-but 2BSD ports. In fact, I'm aware of only one 2BSD port, and that's RetroBSD to a 32-bit, though highly constrained, MIPS PIC part. Warner --0000000000005bc82205ac4f4dbf Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 8:27 AM John C= owan <cowan@ccil.org> wrote:
<= div dir=3D"ltr">Broadly yes.=C2=A0 2BSD was for the PDP-11, and while it co= uld probably have been ported to another 16-bit box, I don't think that= was ever done by anyone.=C2=A0

I'm not aware of any 16-but 2BSD ports. In fact, I'm aware of only= one 2BSD port, and that's RetroBSD to a 32-bit, though highly constrai= ned, MIPS PIC part.

Warner=C2=A0
--0000000000005bc82205ac4f4dbf--