From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: imp@bsdimp.com (Warner Losh) Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2017 12:37:52 -0600 Subject: [TUHS] GNU vs BSD before the lawsuit and before Linux In-Reply-To: <201703190718.v2J7IwQs025612@freefriends.org> References: <20170314153815.GA32726@mcvoy.com> <9deec795-ecd6-7924-c10f-b722ee388a0c@kilonet.net> <20170314155718.GH32139@yeono.kjorling.se> <47c38ea0-accb-407b-26c8-6b4877657b21@kilonet.net> <201703190718.v2J7IwQs025612@freefriends.org> Message-ID: On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 1:18 AM, wrote: > "Jeremy C. Reed" wrote: > >> So around same time GNU project didn't publish some the most common >> tools, but soon did. I didn't check, but I am pretty sure these are all >> different code than the rewritten BSD code. Duplicated work. > > ISTR that the smaller utils were duplicated. 4.4BSD shipped gawk instead > of original Unix awk, and used GCC (and I guess the binutils) as the > compiler suite. So some GNU stuff was used. All the GNU and X11 stuff was under contrib in 4.4-lite. This included gawk, gcc, binutils, perl, emacs, flex, gdb, groff, kermit, libg++, mh, nvi, rcs, gnu sort and a few other sundries. But the research awk was also included. The build system by default included gawk though... Warner