From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 0a0515db for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 00:07:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id D4C7D9B961; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:07:17 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBD969B552; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:07:04 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="zMfsYdEv"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 14E2E9B552; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:07:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f173.google.com (mail-qt1-f173.google.com [209.85.160.173]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 50CA293D06 for ; Thu, 24 Oct 2019 10:07:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f173.google.com with SMTP id d17so20414614qto.3 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:07:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bsdimp-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ahFVXqkOEJNBkQkuh0xYczU9K0lSb5/X7tXtB7aO3G8=; b=zMfsYdEvZn72ozqaYRi1Wvalm8VsN9zLc8LbP5cyGxut5LAExMLeAt73HAiNdk47xV nuZH+UUVhgHS2HyiEh4FN+feITEwnxPMBWSBzGK/1xoolfcFZDN/+ahPM3SGM6/zMwY9 YmCrIgQqkvbrLbVndDUTBw+WlAIvk3vafrwugqJ/q7b9CCeRPF/r96iynJTc8BIaGiWU RKebaT4tj/hzcyPgmhrW5cPTCw1Vy2NeERi5caU6YJlPfoATQXfU9Z+KrqhyJ7JTK563 Gx/TPplHOC+XSSEBhGys2BbveU+PKXnkz9cRfiXyCgA/3UWguD52Nn0meYtveXsRLsKY ITlA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ahFVXqkOEJNBkQkuh0xYczU9K0lSb5/X7tXtB7aO3G8=; b=qS99VQx26BDnXGoOG2ySLyg4rwTSG+vqhnukjhJ6pupFm2QoUe6aYhCFkvBSjUdZeq n7U4SkrFPQiEkSBOFGtlM8d+hHDJgssPjATvSFBjQ1M8jecNK6s7BgjYpkExySrUQ93Z q3mje+c4fjfpuc1szEwBKulL0M7LL2BHTF9OlLPD8kS4sRZawrk3TP1bcYlHdMa3sqFq za8Wl93eM2YtfZ9bLz82hCFr4NRrjH1bDmZU9s/FzGt87y/TluvNOaQ4gl3fY1shZrnn jxAzf+zZLWXkP+Z6X2Up/HqsxXoPRemYShnU87AhGo4iF78w8vtYfUnhIh50Zuu6y9N0 9lew== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXKIj2FwMqBoo/h3FZi1q+gaFBFsd51AD/Q1nTqrxyf/zD0m3K9 Bz1b4teUfYUBP/IwZrLqIcUneYNbCWyd2OsXXMn9BKF1 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxhLEvoL4/blw3DvXY5sanri77jJocgWpue2SeIyZ3NR7mtjXP9BiT7dIAeM86BhQIUBTeWN4Vg5aOVF922GMk= X-Received: by 2002:aed:3063:: with SMTP id 90mr1469871qte.242.1571875621451; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 17:07:01 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20191021062242.GA91599@indra.papnet.eu> <20191022180705.GD51849@server.rulingia.com> <7455e361-b2fd-96b3-b9cd-37730f9aeed7@mhorton.net> <9f77f0d4cba8e6bc1f6fb9b5e26e883a@firemail.de> In-Reply-To: <9f77f0d4cba8e6bc1f6fb9b5e26e883a@firemail.de> From: Warner Losh Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:06:50 -0600 Message-ID: To: Thomas Paulsen Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000000c69b305959cd0cc" Subject: Re: [TUHS] PDP-7 UNIX filesystem X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --0000000000000c69b305959cd0cc Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 3:04 AM Thomas Paulsen wrote: > > > > dd is deprecated? I'm surprised. I use it all the time. It's great when > > I don't think so. A quick google search doesn't support that. > dd isn't deprecated. There's no heir apparent, it's in POSIX.1 and there's no advantage to changing. There's not even been talk of that, at east in *BSD land. Warner --0000000000000c69b305959cd0cc Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


=
On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 3:04 AM Thoma= s Paulsen <thomas.paulsen@= firemail.de> wrote:


> dd is deprecated?=C2=A0 I'm surprised. I use it all the time. It&#= 39;s great when

I don't think so. A quick google search doesn't support that.

dd isn't=C2=A0deprecated. There's no= heir apparent, it's in POSIX.1 and there's no advantage to changin= g. There's not even been talk of that, at east in *BSD land.
=
Warner=C2=A0
--0000000000000c69b305959cd0cc--