[TUHS] Re: NFS 40th anniversary event

[Tom Lyon <pugs78@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2273 bytes --]

No collaborators.  Not that I'm trying at all, the talk kinda got the urge
out of my system.
I therorize that many people could benefit - but no hard data.

On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 6:41 PM Bakul Shah <bakul@iitbombay.org> wrote:

> I viewed this last October. Seemed like a bunch of sensible ideas. Did you
> find any collaborators? [Not offering, just curious!]
>
> I see these "storage" categories: chunks, files, namespaces, metadata,
> databases & streams [1]. If you define a network protocol to handle
> critical operations on them all, implementations would likely follow.
> Engineers do better with well defined boundaries compared to "somewhere
> beyond there"!
>
> [1] probably could be simplified.
>
> On Aug 13, 2025, at 9:43 AM, Tom Lyon <pugs78@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> BTW, my own opinions abut NFS can be seen in my "NFS Must Die!" talk here:
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZVF_djcccKc&ab_channel=TomLyon
>
> Not that NFS *was* bad - but it *is* bad (for non-casual use).
> Like the C language, it was great for its time.  Not so much anymore.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 9:24 AM Peter Weinberger (温博格) via TUHS <
> tuhs@tuhs.org> wrote:
>
>> It was a research proof-of-princple. (i.e.. partly principled and
>> partly really hacky. My list of its issues was pretty long.)
>>
>> (If A mounted B's file system somewhere, and B mounted A's, then the
>> directory tree was infinite. That's mathematics, not a bug.)
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 11:56 AM Larry McVoy <lm@mcvoy.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:18:34AM -0400, Dan Cross wrote:
>> > > On Wed, Aug 13, 2025 at 10:00???AM Douglas McIlroy
>> > > <douglas.mcilroy@dartmouth.edu> wrote:
>> > > > I was always sorry that Peter Weinberger's RFS never made it outside
>> > > > Bell Labs. It allowed networking between separately administered
>> > > > systems by mapping UIDs.
>> > >
>> > > I believe it did?  If I recall correctly, it was available with System
>> > > V, though perhaps I am misremembering.
>> >
>> > Sunos had it, my office mate ported it.  I was unimpressed, it worked
>> well
>> > between the same archs but was riddled with byte order problems and
>> > ioctl calls that were not portable.
>>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3506 bytes --]