From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.5 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [50.116.15.146]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16E7526B0F for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 00:34:12 +0200 (CEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9702A43107; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:34:08 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-pj1-x1035.google.com (mail-pj1-x1035.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1035]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF2E442A9C for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 08:34:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-pj1-x1035.google.com with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c8517aab46so3502642a91.1 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:34:03 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719441243; x=1720046043; darn=tuhs.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=HrJcbHUM0iV1QEGX8kCvlyuwAuTT/WFVKfSdqoq5FUw=; b=mMVXOIduObiMQbgMF/0O9zSW18+N4KERcwq1EgrU/rq/QH45EQhMrvKhXbFTewjE/c RJY1KwnZA/Z43jZC1rim2s02Us4HamCfxMFziGYcdz7Zot4CHFMwwTJncEZW4tg3YMHo nolYLsD+x4VSmIBFzNqRQqh9eJf/NB3t/1FgLblpw5SPNuu2TUMVqrj4mL/6ozgOXTVg vq/wjpiagrluRQAwkqmbgAC3Mzh5lwQOQBPSxjz5SzO9PG9e+2eLbvHeXvjgUqrKCD5H Ct+v5wJJ9z3IfAaafWrOThKUMyTA67j+PYJGzT5I4ZabKPEqjSV8I7Ka9sGhHQbXrhwW 6Kbw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719441243; x=1720046043; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=HrJcbHUM0iV1QEGX8kCvlyuwAuTT/WFVKfSdqoq5FUw=; b=QUSQZq7rVRiXYOqBcnr85bexB38xGXD266rfKnS0JU4/tQYmMPrhTwA9u3CWsNLD6R VW8gsxW5QwvxBT8eP+6UfEIMIhHRhOYRGQrTgpCqicPqxuhZgA1AcFvD4ycrtxv8DFQo TLjHcx5HR4IqTDqCSChYwO3Z5QbfrTdaXwJvIOi3jtO1u0kDZmWP2cQuXjWWwaE1dg9T QD7OnfSTH7iRY5K97R9l9h8okV2Ajj/zb4061M83kYPEiaOGwM7lKTLVF7/AltBORwWT nK3iBBteBIcia9U22vxlMBTtDrviFpyXjbmtWvhudTFuo1cZbgH1jGKehEED0FQpHs6r euiw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwLdqelhIMWyM3NFH60A96CgmQBa4Tq1WFRBIiRwZe2SDmTGXRj ufh2jDCqOnRFBThdBQX75HSOC4eu3uFDCCpt0bL7gwP5eHhgpE1L62jjKS+ovxoAaiBaRiQuzKA 1kOB9APIM+HUx8uhJy55tamja0gh61w== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHtCla30+D0tVnXH9ornMK0b9dzX+1PTKMx5HLDNNYuEpZaduqX5FbZkiYv5aXxrM9O7piGELwD3tniTzyMxoo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:e10d:b0:2c2:f25d:5f6d with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c8582759aamr12154565a91.36.1719441242845; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:34:02 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: James Johnston Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 15:33:51 -0700 Message-ID: To: Stuff Received Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007df889061bd29c39" Message-ID-Hash: WB4LIRHPQ5A4YZX2HDHZSVIOG7JEPYWY X-Message-ID-Hash: WB4LIRHPQ5A4YZX2HDHZSVIOG7JEPYWY X-MailFrom: audioskeptic@gmail.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: tuhs@tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: ANSI (C) vs IEEE (POSIX) Standards Body Selection List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --0000000000007df889061bd29c39 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Strictly speaking ANSI would assign a Joint Technical Committee (JTC) who would assign or create a Subcommittee, who would would then create a working group responsible for conformance testing. Don't ask why I know all this. On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 3:32=E2=80=AFPM Stuff Received wrote: > On 2024-06-26 14:35, Marc Rochkind wrote (in part): > > I think historically ANSI did languages. > > Once upon a time, ANSI even had conformance testing (though that is not > really relevant to this thread #6-). > > S. > --=20 James D. (jj) Johnston Chief Scientist, Immersion Networks --0000000000007df889061bd29c39 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Strictly speaking ANSI would assign a Joint Technical= Committee (JTC) who would assign or create a Subcommittee, who would would= then create a working group responsible for conformance testing.

Don't ask why I know all this.

On Wed, Jun 26,= 2024 at 3:32=E2=80=AFPM Stuff Received <stuff@riddermarkfarm.ca> wrote:
On 2024-06-26 14:35, Marc Rochkind wrote= (in part):
> I think historically ANSI did languages.

Once upon a time, ANSI even had conformance testing (though that is not really relevant to this thread #6-).

S.


--
James D. (jj) Johnston

Chief Scientist, I= mmersion Networks
--0000000000007df889061bd29c39--