From: Adam Thornton <athornton@gmail.com>
To: Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8@gmail.com>
Cc: TUHS main list <tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org>, Josh Good <pepe@naleco.com>
Subject: Re: [TUHS] Zombified SCO comes back from the dead, brings trial back to life against IBM
Date: Sat, 3 Apr 2021 20:57:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAP2nic3zxXSyb6y5jEqYSt1wqKP5tZTnLPrs8b6qzrwZoUcDNA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAC5iaNGnWn0YyU5RLS51KJSp_5bxrk5Um2_nKKjeEa3nAxhN3w@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3651 bytes --]
It’s possible I am conflating two conferences in my head and the NetBSD
thing was NYC not Atlanta.
On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 8:42 PM Gregg Levine <gregg.drwho8@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello!
> Adam? Seriously? That was the case when I visited them at one year's
> LinuxWorld. (I think it was the one when we met.) And yes at the
> System Z Council meetings I would catch up with them.
>
> Larry? It is funny, but earlier on I did mention all of that in a
> completely different thread.
>
> But why would the <DELETED!> characters at what was SCO start this
> stupidity all over again? I seem to be missing something.
> -----
> Gregg C Levine gregg.drwho8@gmail.com
> "This signature fought the Time Wars, time and again."
>
> On Sat, Apr 3, 2021 at 10:48 PM Adam Thornton <athornton@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 1, 2021 at 8:54 PM Wesley Parish <wobblygong@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> So from IBM's POV, they could
> >> support Linux - which by then had already been ported to the VM/370
> >> and there was already talk of porting it to the later mainframe
> >> iterations. I don't think anybody was even thinking of porting any of
> >> the *BSD to IBM mainframes till much later, am I right?
> >
> >
> > This is not how I remember it going down.
> >
> > There was an external-to-IBM "Bigfoot" port to S/390 (not S/370) that
> IBM was ignoring until it got alarmingly close to booting, and then all of
> a sudden there was an IBM port to S/390. Clearly (well, *I* thought it was
> clear) they'd had a skunkworks project for some time and Bigfoot forced
> their hand. (Unix v7 *did* run on S/370, and resurrecting that is one of
> my hobby projects that hasn't really gotten off the ground).
> >
> > I was the system administrator of the first publicly-accessible
> Linux-on-S/390 machine--penguinvm.princeton.edu--and indeed in the late 90s
> I and my mentor David Boyes met with some pretty high-level people at IBM
> to advise them how we thought they should proceed. They seemed to take
> much of our advice, but then again I don't think we said anything very
> crazy. (At the time, and for years thereafter, I was with Sine Nomine
> Associates. They're still around.)
> >
> > I also later managed the port of OpenSolaris to zSeries, which, if IBM
> had bought Sun rather than Oracle, would have made my life very different.
> Neale Ferguson did most of the heavy lifting on that port, but I did a lot
> of the tool porting and wrote a disk driver. Alas, IBM tightened the
> screws a little too far and apparently didn't know that Sun had an offer
> from Oracle in its back pocket.
> >
> > But back to the S/390 port--I went to a Linux conference in Atlanta in
> the late 90s ('99, I think) to speak about Linux on S390/Z, and I actually
> went by the NetBSD booth to say, "hey, I can maybe hook you guys up with a
> development virtual machine," and what I got was an earful about "your
> so-called portability" from someone who was clearly much more invested in
> hating Linux than in, you know, saying, "wow, OK, I realize you're not
> offering me cycles on a super-awesome machine, but, yeah, it's not nothing,
> cool, here's who you should talk to if you're interested in getting a port
> going."
> >
> > So I don't think you can lay all the blame on BSD inaction on Linux, is
> all I'm saying. By '99, I think it was, maybe if NetBSD, which already had
> its reputation for spectacular portability, hadn't staffed its booth with a
> jackass still trying to fight the Unix Wars, that story might have turned
> out differently.
> >
> > Adam
>
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 4450 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-04 3:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 86+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-01 14:50 Josh Good
2021-04-01 15:12 ` Warner Losh
2021-04-01 15:27 ` Josh Good
2021-04-01 15:33 ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-01 16:14 ` Kevin Bowling
2021-04-01 16:26 ` John Cowan
2021-04-01 17:54 ` Thomas Paulsen
2021-04-01 16:27 ` Nemo Nusquam
2021-04-02 2:16 ` Kevin Bowling
2021-04-02 3:52 ` Wesley Parish
2021-04-02 5:26 ` Kevin Bowling
2021-04-02 16:03 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-02 16:11 ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-02 16:39 ` Heinz Lycklama
2021-04-02 17:14 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-02 17:17 ` [TUHS] AIX repeat [was " Charles H Sauer
2021-04-03 1:24 ` [TUHS] " Wesley Parish
2021-04-04 2:46 ` Adam Thornton
2021-04-04 2:50 ` Adam Thornton
2021-04-04 5:29 ` [TUHS] How to Kill a Technical Conference (was: Zombified SCO comes back from the dead, brings trial back to life against IBM) G. Branden Robinson
2021-04-04 18:22 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-04 20:54 ` Richard Salz
2021-04-04 21:11 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-05 0:36 ` John Cowan
2021-04-05 2:19 ` Warner Losh
2021-04-05 18:07 ` [TUHS] How to Kill a Technical Conference John Gilmore
2021-04-05 19:30 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-05 20:34 ` Richard Salz
2021-04-05 20:42 ` William Cheswick
2021-04-06 4:37 ` Ed Bradford
2021-04-05 20:39 ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-05 21:11 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-05 21:17 ` Dan Cross
2021-04-06 15:39 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-06 5:49 ` Dave Horsfall
2021-04-05 7:48 ` [TUHS] Whither Usenix [was How To Kill A Technical Conference] arnold
2021-04-05 14:05 ` [TUHS] How to Kill a Technical Conference (was: Zombified SCO comes back from the dead, brings trial back to life against IBM) Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-05 22:26 ` David Arnold
2021-04-04 23:30 ` A. P. Garcia
2021-04-04 3:41 ` [TUHS] Zombified SCO comes back from the dead, brings trial back to life against IBM Gregg Levine
2021-04-04 3:57 ` Adam Thornton [this message]
2021-04-02 5:41 ` David Arnold
2021-04-02 6:09 ` Steve Nickolas
2021-04-02 7:00 ` arnold
2021-04-02 9:53 ` Steve Nickolas
2021-04-02 10:26 ` arnold
2021-04-02 14:02 ` Josh Good
2021-04-02 14:17 ` Steve Nickolas
2021-04-02 15:16 ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-02 15:28 ` Fabio Scotoni
2021-04-03 1:50 ` Dave Horsfall
2021-04-03 1:55 ` Warner Losh
2021-04-03 2:23 ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-03 2:34 ` Earl Baugh
2021-04-03 6:16 ` Dan Stromberg
2021-04-04 16:18 ` Tony Finch
2021-04-04 1:48 ` David Arnold
2021-04-04 2:23 ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-04 8:55 ` Josh Good
2021-04-04 14:43 ` Michael Parson
2021-04-04 15:36 ` Warner Losh
2021-04-04 16:15 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-04 22:25 ` David Arnold
2021-04-04 22:55 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-05 2:30 ` Dave Horsfall
2021-04-04 23:00 ` Bakul Shah
2021-04-04 23:33 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-05 1:34 ` Bakul Shah
2021-04-05 2:58 ` Kenneth Goodwin
2021-04-05 12:35 ` John Cowan
2021-04-05 20:44 ` Kevin Bowling
2021-04-04 23:34 ` Josh Good
2021-04-04 20:08 ` Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
2021-04-04 21:00 ` Jon Steinhart
2021-04-04 21:40 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-04 21:54 ` Lyndon Nerenberg (VE7TFX/VE6BBM)
2021-04-04 22:02 ` Jon Steinhart
2021-04-04 21:58 ` Clem Cole
2021-04-04 23:48 ` Dave Horsfall
2021-04-04 23:53 ` Larry McVoy
2021-04-07 5:15 ` Dan Stromberg
2021-04-05 13:37 ` Theodore Ts'o
2021-04-07 1:52 ` Adam Thornton
2021-04-02 15:25 ` Josh Good
2021-04-03 3:10 ` John Cowan
2021-04-02 16:40 ` Boyd Lynn Gerber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAP2nic3zxXSyb6y5jEqYSt1wqKP5tZTnLPrs8b6qzrwZoUcDNA@mail.gmail.com \
--to=athornton@gmail.com \
--cc=gregg.drwho8@gmail.com \
--cc=pepe@naleco.com \
--cc=tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).