From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.4 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id eb8f4595 for ; Fri, 4 Oct 2019 22:42:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 79DF89BD0F; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 08:42:16 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA49B9B8F0; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 08:41:45 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="lOJ/KYJA"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id D3A589B8F0; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 08:41:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f41.google.com (mail-ot1-f41.google.com [209.85.210.41]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6308F948D7 for ; Sat, 5 Oct 2019 08:41:42 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f41.google.com with SMTP id c10so6593946otd.9 for ; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:41:42 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=54MRkPc1bwajIQ8+vcRUEfc7AZknjeaEN1wPhyb2qNs=; b=lOJ/KYJAl8qNWNJErxy3tnxnUocynELZsWDyoTOS+cveZk9oNnKG1yh1q2m7EH5MdK 5GxOPOgmPmgkUNydh8WMb+/iDfhKziKXEprSZdqwgqRkiDbP00NPGWrkLxjnxJHCzrAr AVxhvXIptdRv1jUDezAxL1N9Vzo+ikqGE8srIc5cHgIrygetLArtISK69stImKlQbUlF B/EW7o73jJnbaE6k4rjepyiaE3vQwTZZpxKdcPDbdg9cT9HDAXdpNhAjmuhhNOmfwrRn qPMu+3UNCQ0N8TMqj1ZEH2t1oGe9Dziol+mmGXO1ibF4gvzzwBfpd3ysjRKF2RC94kPE 4lGA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=54MRkPc1bwajIQ8+vcRUEfc7AZknjeaEN1wPhyb2qNs=; b=TvpTyDqVDM3c9l7sEkvz5Px82ZZRnyg+ltXl7F+0jYlVw0gxPQapgD5PAYStwyr9sZ fxHgejAHuQvDQzKAbJmcOUKG82WdCqMQB+QCokxENvY7NZnvecRZpdTBoXjj5LtK48+h vXTtEcD9yAutAUdhy4VPuqV+KpayjKIcapjNTRSy9J2QeAxmhcz+oaYUOmbiYpHC2gOK aJ9pxjTcBqGFCKGgO8fFQJWqlPL5jeTrnJQfSbURhw4OkyyjsowUYAJ+F8yEi4fYVgdJ PMOEFxmdPpmLpp05kAxfUuj1cZHC0U0Nm8CsG97HUF3Gq0ONU4ZkKrdHbfZ9br1U7SQi d4kA== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVHdcP5EgL86P5ZD3HpIVE8w8XGtxKWB61v8QwzQos4sUacEUp5 qsd8eMPVZDGKIOXUAa2maOMqOlgaGIjA8Yo1M+yjrMpK X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqz6BqMPIA3SEsHagJdIJdGEMlL32Yj0axWaZ6V9ks3PrLWyXsjtiTIdUaVXSBuv5yRTuzTk0hUimZe0Cyr9Thg= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:1015:: with SMTP id a21mr9079860otp.300.1570228901350; Fri, 04 Oct 2019 15:41:41 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: ron minnich Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2019 15:41:30 -0700 Message-ID: To: TUHS main list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [TUHS] RFC formatting X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" "why is the formatting so weird" someone asked me. I am guessing, looking at RFC 1, that it was formatted with an ancestor of runoff but ... anyone? ron