From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 14739 invoked from network); 8 Dec 2020 18:12:02 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 8 Dec 2020 18:12:02 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 272FE945F9; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:11:55 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 937C7944D4; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:11:18 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="rX23dlLB"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 41B60944D4; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:11:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-ot1-f51.google.com (mail-ot1-f51.google.com [209.85.210.51]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00BAB944D3 for ; Wed, 9 Dec 2020 04:11:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-ot1-f51.google.com with SMTP id f16so16626847otl.11 for ; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:11:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TP50nCMe+YiO87UydXhPN2115Ni3O1NcKoOI0LzOqYU=; b=rX23dlLBpJnVV0fuPXeOkTHLXJT3jXOpt71OZXX7PjW3o7Atv+tbhes4LhZDVnE4gj tdXsVqU8L/KWNu+Vwk/DxDtQma8Rn4w0GtTTTEP6xBGzc30lh+5LifTG8QI2Q0moQVhV Gma/nLPJmvdDGwfJUITV9EPl6O4MlbWf9I6xYB0KTDFvFrncpf3erk2dPk3bgA/Y7nvb 6UQwGke+WXyoOuR+y/sCEg+fHF3L4P7MfGPVHZpNHk4oK6cbTelIrhNzTeJEVj2nDYl7 6Lvw8ZZfNsZ+ucwE+gPPQm9N2MtX5DmCLBYF/j9uZBZdj6QAB9h1bWckJ5KuWOjJ+lNE DdvA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TP50nCMe+YiO87UydXhPN2115Ni3O1NcKoOI0LzOqYU=; b=Cb31We6/IpASKPIgERJrpNwBFJl+dNdVt/1CBRunIUueZiNEkU9PKdtlnfAg2K6ljY gZbytfDI8o8EuygEpts2P+ZNBo+I9sA1w7oygVG7bDZWQ+59sn83kXJdgjdbWNscseiy hUvy5t3mdk+5Y18PZRBxCEgqcjfwTTOYRbdmh/n8pp77BztzqpOuXJWF1IkL0FdU5KeG 1WGAbbd+lx/95l/nhRMckw9lDkqcLvAeIw1caer7oQzMG5y/PcKGSqBA1fykzS54qe4R 20haOvprW7VY7fChQzg8Jx1cebkZQtrB/+2njCWpsze5H2kN1co3gnQwBFgRyz+itlXI 0MxA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533I4+of/5O+pbCv1//b/4J42NQUiLfIKl7Z2/nHX0hXGMSRtFYy xMrQW2pY65zHw72cj4aPfdDvbb97OzSDDDBcMCt2mg4zQoo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzoE9vMsvx1ee69gfpfWLLoePhhAfadD1kCIdtX/eHwV5Wc8DgyRcTMONIawLBYNNg4asS/f9aQqTRiVVXBmkk= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:889:: with SMTP id 9mr17899370otf.6.1607451070831; Tue, 08 Dec 2020 10:11:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: ron minnich Date: Tue, 8 Dec 2020 10:11:00 -0800 Message-ID: To: TUHS main list Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: [TUHS] Were cron and at done at the same time? Or one before the other? X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" When I got into Unix in 1976 cron and at were both there. I got to wondering for no particular reason which came first -- I had always assumed cron, but ...? Anyone know?