From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rminnich@gmail.com (ron minnich) Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2017 15:25:57 +0000 Subject: [TUHS] A decision In-Reply-To: <20170407152336.GB14089@mcvoy.com> References: <20170405222255.GA4109@minnie.tuhs.org> <20170406200839.GA30805@naleco.com> <20170406203229.GA86947@wopr> <20170406214620.GD30805@naleco.com> <20170407115646.0WVxJ%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <83CBA573-B91D-4401-9C7A-70F0B816F0F7@jctaylor.com> <20170407150901.GA87149@wopr> <20170407152336.GB14089@mcvoy.com> Message-ID: I agree with Warren's decision, but I think out of respect for Joerg this discussion ought to be taken off list. On Fri, Apr 7, 2017 at 8:23 AM Larry McVoy wrote: > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:09:01AM -0700, Kurt H Maier wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 07, 2017 at 08:20:06AM -0400, William Corcoran wrote: > > > > > > Also, having a policy in place would allow for progressive discipline > to be implemented: first a warning, then privileges suspended and finally > privileges revoked. > > > > > > > But that is what happened. > > > > khm > > Indeed. Perhaps I shouldn't comment, since I had some conflicts with > Joerg, but just this one observation. To this day, I struggle with my > own lack of tact, I'm just not good at coming across well. That's my > problem, noone taught me that, noone encourages me to be impolite, > it's mine, and I own it. If I don't keep it under control then I lose > access to mailing lists, forums, what have you. > > Joerg was warned and sadly couldn't or wouldn't tone down his interactions > on the list. It's a bummer, because he does have things to add to the > conversation. But some of his contributions caused people to leave the > list. Keep that in mind, we lost people and that's never good. > > I'm not sure how any formal process would have had a different outcome > and, as khm says, the informal process was identical to the proposed > formal process. > > --lm > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: