From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: grawity@gmail.com (=?UTF-8?Q?Mantas_Mikul=C4=97nas?=) Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2017 20:38:30 +0300 Subject: [TUHS] RFS was: Re: UNIX of choice these days? In-Reply-To: <201709270844.v8R8i2kd021180@freefriends.org> References: <20170923091704.GD10152@darioniedermann.it> <201709270844.v8R8i2kd021180@freefriends.org> Message-ID: On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 11:44 AM, wrote: > Clem Cole wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Arthur Krewat > wrote: > > > > > Where does RFS (AT&T System III) fit in all of this? > > > > > Well it was not in PWB 3.0 - aka System III. > > It was in System V Release 3, thus the confusion. Sun integrated it > into SunOS 4.0 (IIRC) and then pulled it out around 4.1.something. It > was for sure gone from 4.1.3 and 4.1.4. > ...and to this day, even the Linux errno.h carries such gems as EDOTDOT, described as "RFS specific error"... Speaking of which, I've been meaning to ask – what was the original meaning of such errnos as EL2HLT or ENOANO? (And, well, the remaining few dozen of them?) I've figured out a few, but gave up on some. -- Mantas Mikulėnas -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: