From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [IPv6:2600:3c01:e000:146::1]) by inbox.vuxu.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1569C226FC for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 05:42:15 +0200 (CEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFAD443B17; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:42:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail.kaybuena.com (syn-071-042-153-194.biz.spectrum.com [71.42.153.194]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2DFB043B0F for ; Thu, 27 Jun 2024 13:42:03 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtpclient.apple (4dot2 [71.42.153.195]) by mail.kaybuena.com (8.17.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 45R3ftre3139606; Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:41:55 -0500 From: "Charles H. Sauer" Message-Id: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_0EA4F3BE-E654-48C4-87B7-1948BADD9163" Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.600.62\)) Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:41:45 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20240627023637.E16DE8E2CA18@ary.qy> To: John Levine References: <20240627023637.E16DE8E2CA18@ary.qy> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.600.62) X-Greylist: Sender passed SPF test, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.6.4 (mail.kaybuena.com [71.42.153.194]); Wed, 26 Jun 2024 22:41:55 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID-Hash: TV6BFZ6DICEN3773MFS6RRR57PQE3IHU X-Message-ID-Hash: TV6BFZ6DICEN3773MFS6RRR57PQE3IHU X-MailFrom: sauer@technologists.com X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: tuhs@tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: arithmetic, Re: ANSI (C) vs IEEE (POSIX) Standards Body Selection List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: --Apple-Mail=_0EA4F3BE-E654-48C4-87B7-1948BADD9163 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 > On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:36=E2=80=AFPM, John Levine = wrote: >=20 > It appears that Charles H Sauer (he/him) = said: >> I was waiting for Heinz to say something, assuming he would at least = say=20 >> what he did about the beginnings of POSIX. >>=20 >> Another IEEE standard of great historical import is IEEE 754-1985 for=20= >> representing floating point numbers. Many of the 801 people wanted to=20= >> preserve IBM Hexadecimal floating point introduced with System/360. >=20 > In view of the well known horrible numeric properities of the hex > floating point, why? Because they had so much code written to work > around it? >=20 > R's, > John Maybe I knew back then, but anything I say now is supposition. I suppose = the same mindset that wanted to see PL.8 succeed as PL/I revisited = wanted to see 801 succeed as 370 revisited. In any case, quite a few of = the Yorktown people that moved to Austin to help with what became = RS/6000 came with the notion HFP was the true course. Though you were no longer involved in that time frame, IIRC, you = probably had a better sense than most non-IBM people of why I said "it = was more like Mn competing factions within = N competing companies.=E2=80=9D=20 That Phil Hester was able to force 754 instead of HFP is more a credit = to his political and technical skills than most non-IBM could = appreciate. Charlie -- voice: +1.512.784.7526 e-mail: sauer@technologists.com = =20 fax: +1.512.346.5240 web: https://technologists.com/sauer/ = Facebook/Google/LinkedIn/Twitter: CharlesHSauer --Apple-Mail=_0EA4F3BE-E654-48C4-87B7-1948BADD9163 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

On Jun 26, 2024, at 9:36=E2=80=AFPM, John Levine = <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

It appears that Charles H = Sauer (he/him) <sauer@technologists.com> said:
I was waiting for Heinz to say something, assuming he = would at least say
what he did about the beginnings of = POSIX.

Another IEEE standard of great historical import is IEEE = 754-1985 for
representing floating point numbers. Many of the 801 = people wanted to
preserve IBM Hexadecimal floating point introduced = with System/360.

In view of the well known horrible = numeric properities of the hex
floating point, why? Because they had = so much code written to work
around = it?

R's,
John

Maybe = I knew back then, but anything I say now is supposition. I suppose the = same mindset that wanted to see PL.8 succeed as PL/I revisited wanted to = see 801 succeed as 370 revisited. In any case, quite a few of the = Yorktown people that moved to Austin to help with what became RS/6000 = came with the notion HFP was the true = course.

Though you were no longer involved in = that time frame, IIRC, you probably had a better sense than most non-IBM = people of why I said "it was more like = <em>M<sub>n</sub></em> competing factions within = <em>N</em> competing = companies.=E2=80=9D 

That Phil Hester was = able to force 754 instead of HFP is more a credit to his political and = technical skills than most non-IBM could = appreciate.

Charlie

--
voice: +1.512.784.7526 =       e-mail: sauer@technologists.com           <= /span>
fax: +1.512.346.5240 =         web: https://technologists.com/sauer/
Facebook/Google/LinkedIn/Twitter: = CharlesHSauer

= --Apple-Mail=_0EA4F3BE-E654-48C4-87B7-1948BADD9163--