From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: brantley@coraid.com (Brantley Coile) Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2009 20:11:46 -0500 Subject: [TUHS] late research unix question In-Reply-To: <20091201.174857.1573374699.imp@bsdimp.com> References: <1259713867.11400.for-standards-violators@oclsc.org> <20091201.174857.1573374699.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: The protocol isn't the problem. All the binaries that get pushed over it is the problem. The Jerq down loaded programs to run on the terminal. That's why sam is in two parts. Brantley On Dec 1, 2009, at 7:48 PM, M. Warner Losh wrote: > Would the bitblit protocol be easier to emulate that then whole > machine? > > _______________________________________________ > TUHS mailing list > TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org > https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs > _______________________________________________ TUHS mailing list TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org https://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs