From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: ron@ronnatalie.com (Ronald Natalie) Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 08:31:34 -0400 Subject: [TUHS] Gnu/Stallman (was Bugs in V6 'dcheck') In-Reply-To: <20140602050317.GB27136@eureka.lemis.com> References: <201406020209.s5229Q5o006174@stowe.cs.dartmouth.edu> <00668C2D-BF21-44EA-A7D8-A9530CA24551@bsdimp.com> <20140602031715.GA27136@eureka.lemis.com> <20140602033746.GG18282@mercury.ccil.org> <20140602050317.GB27136@eureka.lemis.com> Message-ID: Amusingly I never learned VI. I had worked for a group that was beholden to Interactive Systems editor (which I believe was a variant of Yost's Rand Editor) and by the time I left there I was working with various pre-GNU Unix EMACS (Warren Montgomery, JOVE, Gosling). I even worked for Unipress for a very short period as a consultant. To this day if there's no EMACS I juse use ed or ex. It always amazed my coworkers how fast I fly in line editor mode. On Jun 2, 2014, at 1:03 AM, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: >> >> >>> Not part of my vocabulary, but I couldn't live without Emacs. Shall >>> we degrade this discussion into a vi/Emacs fight? >> >> Sure, go ahead. As a firm adherent to "ex", I'll umpire the >> contest. > > :