From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id a3b696b0 for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 00:05:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 995F69B9E7; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:05:57 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 336F49B7EB; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:05:32 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ccc.com header.i=@ccc.com header.b="rVcTTf9B"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0074B9B7B5; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:05:11 +1000 (AEST) Received: from mail-qt1-f181.google.com (mail-qt1-f181.google.com [209.85.160.181]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4D089B7EB for ; Thu, 18 Jul 2019 10:05:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: by mail-qt1-f181.google.com with SMTP id a15so25286772qtn.7 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:05:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ccc.com; s=google; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kvE6RnuF56kvUuIPr2dP/B+j28yJoRbTAL3R0H4N2qU=; b=rVcTTf9BlzOjZ/rHKkj7obbiQ85pbgLtXlrJPp2bNIB/3MbD+sLHVQp92vxixjy8DT XmDFhmcH6+HQxHm3JSarQVy3z2eRk+F5Vl0ujODycvxl5HqI6d/3PItkbATfnQGxUbRA wTUhoKLTER1N61MXzGPf/C782fV9wCImUBJx4= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=kvE6RnuF56kvUuIPr2dP/B+j28yJoRbTAL3R0H4N2qU=; b=Cv/deFLEmDVfiT2ECD6fhgqVKpE06y1VdkBGSzrAVRJ/f3OPtVuw5IlAtj1pQ9wXIW nhTe4QzCATB/E3OK2GDLSTxhgjveStRAdU3WROTKRZqeTcdVDHfhSMXPKsKzDTnuZtH+ 82w4dnHHzZC7oXfSFGLRmzvLwhQyE8iL8ngzb9CGsVAViEDQ1SjyAjtXxzCecYvvjK5I sGGG9qCjFFwHJ/Po9DiWaf9Zl9KhVRaTxngl6U60VSNoR+4XBinoztNx4tCJj/StF/tq 9DaXgzkDYpYoJVPjNhOjjo5z4Fj/co5BoQjwZenyfUNgpFApmwaIe+m3omzbNHY8p5VC 0klQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUg1j///uJ4UZ5Mednlg4PbEDT3tMvaO59mJH3b+XtfhGnAO4PG GM3MZ3rmXZRbJ4wBUQYtsQobXg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwhi+OQaTwE2shg5lm7J+YVTkQHvala2ZSBL0LtbOSfmDo9byc/TScCIMW6KDUgJG6aQuIxdg== X-Received: by 2002:aed:3ed8:: with SMTP id o24mr28564926qtf.252.1563408301612; Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.10.108] (pool-173-48-42-254.bstnma.fios.verizon.net. [173.48.42.254]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z8sm11166362qki.23.2019.07.17.17.05.00 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 17 Jul 2019 17:05:01 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) From: Clem cole X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16F203) In-Reply-To: <36C1A87C-FA3D-475A-8F6D-894CAE3F2EF7@bitblocks.com> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2019 20:04:58 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <8235a090-c48a-4587-8974-23305233bc33@PU1APC01FT026.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> <3CFC8159-08DD-4647-8CEF-FE8D196AB3C9@ccc.com> <610F6FCB-F24D-4788-953A-83E0E6456622@ccc.com> <017d16e0-3a7d-b3e7-29b8-8a454d78463f@e-bbes.com> <201907170810.x6H8AELx031974@freefriends.org> <46FC947C-F150-4835-A858-3EE05A394A6A@alchemistowl.org> <36C1A87C-FA3D-475A-8F6D-894CAE3F2EF7@bitblocks.com> To: Bakul Shah Subject: Re: [TUHS] Old 386 Unix Versions, was: Re: PCC for the i386 X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" It is an uK. I have a complete set of doc but I don=E2=80=99t think I have t= he code at this point. Fyi AT&T was supposed to use Chorus for SVR5 but it n= ever shipped. The chorus folks opened an office in Portland Or. iirc Michel= Gien moved out there for a bit. [We were working for both OSF and ATT at L= ocus. Fun times. ] Sent from my PDP-7 Running UNIX V0 expect things to be almost but not quite.= =20 > On Jul 17, 2019, at 7:22 PM, Bakul Shah wrote: >=20 >> On Jul 17, 2019, at 7:34 AM, Clem Cole wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 17, 2019 at 5:28 AM Arrigo Triulzi = wrote:=20 >>> For example there was Bull=E2=80=99s Chorus which I seem to recall was b= ased on Mach or a competing microkernel (it was a very long time ago and I u= sed it for no mare than about two hours..). >> Close, not quite. Contemporaries but not the same. >>=20 >> Chorus was a C++ rewrite of Gien's Pascal based 'SOL' systems [Gien M. (1= 983). =E2=80=9CThe SOL Operating System=E2=80=9D, USENIX Association, 1983, P= roceedings of the Summer =E2=80=9883 USENIX Conference, Toronto, Canada, Jul= y, 1983, Pages 75-78.] >=20 > A good paper on Chorus: > https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/eab3/b28bebdc202d9c5e2354731bebadf0872aac= .pdf >=20 > Apparently Chorus was not "unix" until the SOL team joined them in 1984! > Its nucleus seem very much like a microkernel. >=20