From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jsteve@superglobalmegacorp.com (Jason Stevens) Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 21:46:47 +0800 Subject: [TUHS] Mach for i386 / Mt Xinu or other In-Reply-To: References: <1c400c16-5f18-4475-a8e2-99976e571a37@SG2APC01FT039.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> <635c06b4-0048-4951-95ca-283c64c30fed@SG2APC01FT017.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> <1ba0f584-6478-4332-bcae-63ac6cedf2f6@SG2APC01FT041.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com> Message-ID: It's a net/2 something much later. I'm interested in what would have been an encumbered pre net/2 release of 4.2 or 4.3 for the i386... I found out that CMU had BSD running on Mach, and I suspect there is straight ports as well. It's that evelotionary dead end of 386 UNIX from 1986-1991 that interests me as they clearly could have had the market but they obviously blew it. On February 19, 2017 3:01:04 PM GMT+08:00, Steve Nickolas wrote: >On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, jsteve at superglobalmegacorp.com wrote: > >> True, but It’s not 4.3 BSD … I was hoping for something vintage of >the >> era, just as Solaris 11 is SYSV, but it’s nothing like SYSVr2 on the >> VAX…. >> >> And historical is far more interesting than something I can just go >buy >> retail…. Speaking as someone who’s own a NeXT, and even bought OS X >> Server 1.0 on release. > >Isn't Jolix essentially Reno, if a 4.3BSD is what you're after? > >-uso. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: