From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: jsteve@superglobalmegacorp.com (Jason Stevens) Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2017 10:21:38 +0800 Subject: [TUHS] I just noticed all the cfont aka C++ in research In-Reply-To: References: <5F2D4901-9FEC-4CF8-9D08-AA4342C1F465@superglobalmegacorp.com> Message-ID: I need to get one of those new fangled graphical terminals working! On April 6, 2017 10:20:26 AM GMT+08:00, Noel Hunt wrote: >> Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious wars >> I always imagined NJ being more vi. > > >I would be very much surprised if jim/sam was not the editor >of choice (apart from Ken Thompson who seemed content with >'ed'). > > > >On Thu, Apr 6, 2017 at 12:15 PM, Jason Stevens < >jsteve at superglobalmegacorp.com >> >wrote: > > >I suppose that it would make sense that all of AT&T's leading edge >projects would use research Unix. I've always heard of the original C++ >to C translator but this is the first time I've actually seen it. > >It doesn't look like it had the wide scale following that C or Fortan >had at this point. > >Sadly my experience with C++ was mostly tied to Borland on the micro in >early 90's, which makes it look mature compared to these early >versions. > >It's great finding stuff like this in the tree hiding in plain sight, >if >only you know what to look for. ( http://unix. >front/?cvsroot=rv9> >superglobalmegacorp.com/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/researchv9/cmd/cfront/?cvsroo >t=rv9) > >Or that emacs was in the v9 tree, in the religious wars I always >imagined NJ being more vi. > >Thanks again for making this release happen! > >-- >Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: