From: new_zmkm@hotmail.com (zmkm zmkm)
Subject: [TUHS] My response to SCO vs. Linux
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 11:31:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Law14-F30jwGXSXCWV8000236a2@hotmail.com> (raw)
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3750 bytes --]
Michael
I don�t agree with you on this , your complain about linux is unfair , on
the contrary to many unixers especially the new generation of hackers and
new unix users even those users fed up with Microsoft gimmicks , linux was
miracle touch that helped to re energize the otherwise stale unix market ,
simply look at the market today which operating system has grown beyond any
expectations ? . Another thing , in the days of corporate greed and bullying
a-la-microsoft way, linux played a significant role to cement the open
source movement.
Good old dear BSD , where is it ?? still fighting a niche turf , why it
didn�t burst in the open ? , it�s troubles doesn�t have anything to do with
linux it�s been there way before linux surfaced. I will not go into this
flame war which is better BSD or Linux because both are dear to me and each
has its own strong points and weaknesses .
Finally , this whole nonsense from SCO wouldn't be there if SCO had any good
products to offer or enjoying good revenue , so this law suite shows how
desperate SCO is sinking in the red and using this law suite to float itself
again .
Love it or hate it linux is here to stay J .
_______________
preparing for eventual flame war ,
automatic sprinkler = check
fire extinguishers = check
fire fighting water hose = check
fire proof suite and helmet = check
all systems go .
zmkm
>From: msokolov at ivan.Harhan.ORG (Michael Sokolov)
>To: tuhs at tuhs.org
>Subject: [TUHS] My response to SCO vs. Linux
>Date: Tue, 10 Jun 03 14:01:08 PDT
>
>Here is my response to SCO vs. Linux. The thing is, some of the things they
>are
>saying I agree with most emphatically, except that what those things really
>support is not SCO but our TUHS cause. Their main line, at least as I
>interpret
>it, is that UNIX is the real OS, UNIX is better than Linux, and Linux is
>just a
>naughty child that is becoming more and more of a nuisance to the adults. I
>agree wholeheartedly! I and many other UNIX bigots have been more vocal
>about
>this than SCO.
>
>BUT... UNIX is not what SCO means by this term, UNIX is V7 -> 4BSD! That is
>the
>real UNIX, USG is just a bad commercialized branch that no one ever really
>liked anyway! So to all those Fortune 1000 (or whatever that was) companies
>warned by SCO to stop running Linux, they should throw out those cheap
>micros,
>put all their old large VAXen back online, and run True UNIX, 4.3 BSD UNIX!
>And
>that *is* real UNIX, it comes directly from V7 and openly and proudly
>admits to
>this fact! Isn't an OS that openly and proudly admits to come directly from
>Holy UNIX better than a cheap UNIX copycat that needs to be sued in court
>to
>determine what the hell it really is?
>
>But SCO probably won't be too happy about it as they just gave away the
>True
>UNIX (V7) to the World for free, and it's non-retractable.
>
>So if anything good comes out of this lawsuit it's that maybe, just maybe,
>BSD
>will finally get some attention and use over Linux. The Free Computing
>community doesn't have to suffer any loss whatsoever if SCO wins, we can
>instead just switch from Linux to the much better True UNIX, which is just
>as
>free but a lot more solid, mature, and True. And stick it to SCO and laugh
>diabolically at how they voluntarily made UNIX free without us having to
>seize
>it by force in a revolution.
>
>MS (donning the flameproof spacesuit)
>_______________________________________________
>TUHS mailing list
>TUHS at minnie.tuhs.org
>http://minnie.tuhs.org/mailman/listinfo/tuhs
_________________________________________________________________
The new MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and 2 months FREE*
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/junkmail
next reply other threads:[~2003-06-12 11:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-12 11:31 zmkm zmkm [this message]
2003-06-12 20:21 ` Andy Newman
2003-06-12 23:16 ` Greg 'groggy' Lehey
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-06-13 4:55 Carl Lowenstein
2003-06-19 11:00 ` Peter Jeremy
2003-06-10 21:01 Michael Sokolov
2003-06-11 6:03 ` Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Law14-F30jwGXSXCWV8000236a2@hotmail.com \
--to=new_zmkm@hotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).