From: bqt@update.uu.se (Johnny Billquist)
Subject: [pups] re: PDP-9
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:21:08 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0208211114550.23988-100000@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8bef78f335e274ebd82d30a31ac9c3d8@plan9.bell-labs.com>
On Tue, 20 Aug 2002, Dennis Ritchie wrote:
> Bilquist said (quoting Buitinck):
>
> > So I guess that if you had it running on a PDP-7, you could probably
> > almost take the code unmodified and run it on the PDP-9.
> > The PDP-15 have a different bus (Unibus?) I believe, and thus,
> > peripherials are different from the predecessors.
> > This obviosuly affects the OS. :-)
>
> The 7, 9, 15 were very compatible. I think the -15
> had some scheme for using an index register, which
> the earlier ones didn't have, but it was otherwise
> pretty much identical in IS architecture.
>
> There was very little rewriting to try Unix out
> on the -9 and -15; perhaps just some tweaks in
> the disk device commands. I don't think the
> system actually ran on either for more than a few
> hours. Ken was just playing around.
About as I suspected then.
Interesting to hear that the grade of compatibility was that high. I've
neved had the chance to play with any 18-bitters.
> The -15 may have had an electrically different
> bus, but I'm reasonably sure it was not a Unibus.
> All of them used IOT instructions, not memory-mapped
> IO registers.
The Unibus do not require a memory mapped I/O model, though. And it does
have 18 address and data bits. (Two data bits are used for parity on a
PDP-11.)
The DEC-2020 also used a Unibus.
Johnny
Johnny Billquist || "I'm on a bus
|| on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at update.uu.se || Reading murder books
pdp is alive! || tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-21 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-21 3:55 Dennis Ritchie
2002-08-21 9:19 ` Lars Brinkhoff
2002-08-21 9:21 ` Johnny Billquist [this message]
2002-08-21 9:34 ` [pups] PDP-9 Lars Buitinck
2002-08-21 9:57 ` Johnny Billquist
2002-08-22 2:06 ` [pups] PDP-9 Frank Wortner
2002-08-22 2:47 ` [pups] Re: Missing 1st to 4th Editions Warren Toomey
2002-08-21 8:01 [pups] Re: PDP-9 Roger Ivie
2002-08-21 19:59 [pups] PDP-9 Carl Lowenstein
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0208211114550.23988-100000@Tempo.Update.UU.SE \
--to=bqt@update.uu.se \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).