The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bqt@update.uu.se (Johnny Billquist)
Subject: [pups] Progress on 2.11BSD kernel
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 00:34:21 +0100 (CET)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.21.0303200030310.10410-100000@Tempo.Update.UU.SE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200303192308.h2JN8kD04865@moe.2bsd.com>

On Wed, 19 Mar 2003, Steven M. Schultz wrote:

> 	The buffer cache must be entirely mapped by UMRs - so if you have a 
> 	32KB buffer the kernel will reserve 4 UMRs on a UNIBUS system.   
> 	Realistically a 64KB buffer cache is about the maximum a UNIBUS system 
> 	can have because that takes 8 of the UMRs.  

Are the UMRs allocated and set up statically?
(I haven't looked inside 2BSD for a while now, and can't remember much of
the internals anymore.)

> 	With the old (thankfully no longer in use, etc) 3Com ethernet boards
> 	you had to disable 4 UMRs so the system could access the memory in the
> 	card - that made for a very tight fit.

How many UMRs does the system use? 8 for buffer cache, you might expect
one or two DH11s, that would require a few more, ethernet takes another
few, but it seems there shouldn't be such a shortage.

What did I miss?

	Johnny

Johnny Billquist                  || "I'm on a bus
                                  ||  on a psychedelic trip
email: bqt at update.uu.se           ||  Reading murder books
pdp is alive!                     ||  tryin' to stay hip" - B. Idol




  parent reply	other threads:[~2003-03-19 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-03-19 23:08 Steven M. Schultz
2003-03-19 23:15 ` David Evans
2003-03-19 23:34 ` Johnny Billquist [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2003-03-21 18:33 Steven M. Schultz
2003-03-21 18:26 Steven M. Schultz
2003-03-19 23:52 Steven M. Schultz
2003-03-19 19:09 Steven M. Schultz
2003-03-19 19:30 ` David Evans
2003-03-19 19:06 Carl Lowenstein
2003-03-19 19:14 ` David Evans
2003-03-19 20:12 ` David C. Jenner
2003-03-19 17:51 Steven M. Schultz
2003-03-19 18:08 ` David Evans
2003-03-19 17:36 Steven M. Schultz
2003-03-19 17:46 ` David Evans
2003-03-19 18:24 ` Ian King
2003-03-19 18:59   ` David Evans
2003-03-21 18:08 ` Ian King
2003-03-19  7:44 Ian King

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.LNX.4.21.0303200030310.10410-100000@Tempo.Update.UU.SE \
    --to=bqt@update.uu.se \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).