The Unix Heritage Society mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: segaloco via TUHS <tuhs@tuhs.org>
To: Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu>
Cc: tuhs@tuhs.org
Subject: [TUHS] Re: I can't drive 55: "GOTO considered harmful" 55th anniversary
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 23:18:07 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <RHglcvrCs_xHL1NWcH8pkN1l-IQKszfwYFc8sXRTQRRjGa-7kVJWj-OMzOmWkR89xFwEIiWfoLoAAEHkKF8etYwLR3aGRj9VuwO_MhYbz3s=@protonmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230309230130.q4I-f%steffen@sdaoden.eu>

GOTO is one of those paradoxical things where I would only trust the most sophisticated engineer to know when it's acceptable to use a GOTO but on the flip side would be suspicious of anyone claiming to be an engineer that uses any amount of GOTOs...

Were any of the various GOTOs in languages ever meant to be any more than providing the same level of control that branch statements in assembly do?  Was there ever some vision anyone's aware of concerning a sophisticated, dependable use of GOTOs?  Since my first days poking around learning C GOTO has been mentally filed away as an assembly vestige for folks in transition, not a dependable construct in its own right.  Any alternative camps out there?

- Matt G.

------- Original Message -------
On Thursday, March 9th, 2023 at 3:01 PM, Steffen Nurpmeso <steffen@sdaoden.eu> wrote:


> I wonder if Pink Floyd's Summer68 maybe refers to this.
> Other than that i am addicted and could not live without it.
> The other (terrible) song is from 1984 (east southern US).
> 
> --steffen
> |
> |Der Kragenbaer, The moon bear,
> |der holt sich munter he cheerfully and one by one
> |einen nach dem anderen runter wa.ks himself off
> |(By Robert Gernhardt)

  reply	other threads:[~2023-03-09 23:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-03-09 23:01 [TUHS] " Steffen Nurpmeso
2023-03-09 23:18 ` segaloco via TUHS [this message]
2023-03-09 23:21   ` [TUHS] " Warner Losh
2023-03-09 23:31     ` Luther Johnson
2023-03-09 23:44       ` josh
2023-03-09 23:54       ` Warner Losh
2023-03-10  0:54         ` segaloco via TUHS
2023-03-10  1:08           ` Warner Losh
2023-03-10 10:08             ` Ralph Corderoy
2023-03-10 11:37               ` arnold
2023-03-10 11:56                 ` Ralph Corderoy
2023-03-10 11:59                   ` arnold
2023-03-10 12:11                     ` Ralph Corderoy
2023-03-10  6:15     ` Dave Horsfall
2023-03-10 16:55       ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2023-03-10 17:02         ` Bakul Shah
2023-03-12 20:47         ` Dave Horsfall
2023-03-12 21:50           ` Warner Losh
2023-03-12 22:27             ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2023-03-13  3:09               ` [TUHS] Re: I can't drive 55: "GOTO considered harmful" 55thanniversary Dave Horsfall
2023-03-14 19:54                 ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2023-03-10  1:31   ` [TUHS] Re: I can't drive 55: "GOTO considered harmful" 55th anniversary Rich Morin
2023-03-10 11:37 Noel Chiappa
2023-03-10 15:54 ` Dan Cross
2023-03-12  7:39   ` Anthony Martin
2023-03-12 11:40     ` Dan Cross
2023-03-12 16:40       ` Paul Winalski
2023-03-13  3:25       ` John Cowan
2023-03-13 10:40         ` Alejandro Colomar (man-pages)
2023-03-13 12:19           ` Dan Cross
2023-03-10 11:51 Noel Chiappa
2023-03-10 14:16 ` Ronald Natalie
2023-03-10 14:39   ` John Cowan
2023-03-10 16:30   ` Phil Budne
2023-03-10 17:50     ` Steffen Nurpmeso
2023-03-10 17:57       ` Paul Winalski
2023-03-10 18:12         ` Lawrence Stewart
2023-03-10 17:28   ` Clem Cole
2023-03-10 17:54     ` Paul Winalski
2023-03-10 15:37 Noel Chiappa
2023-03-10 15:46 ` Larry McVoy
2023-03-10 16:04 ` Dan Cross
2023-03-10 18:55 ` Ron Natalie
2023-03-10 19:04   ` Dan Cross
2023-03-10 19:35     ` segaloco via TUHS

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='RHglcvrCs_xHL1NWcH8pkN1l-IQKszfwYFc8sXRTQRRjGa-7kVJWj-OMzOmWkR89xFwEIiWfoLoAAEHkKF8etYwLR3aGRj9VuwO_MhYbz3s=@protonmail.com' \
    --to=tuhs@tuhs.org \
    --cc=segaloco@protonmail.com \
    --cc=steffen@sdaoden.eu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).