From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 32707 invoked from network); 25 Oct 2022 08:35:53 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (50.116.15.146) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 25 Oct 2022 08:35:53 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 312D041DA9; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 18:35:46 +1000 (AEST) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64C9341D7B for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 18:35:39 +1000 (AEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.46]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A84A320095B for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 04:35:36 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 25 Oct 2022 04:35:36 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=papnet.eu; h=cc :content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1666686935; x=1666773335; bh=GNlRW5rONj aUWYIksdqCAEkPGod9bPOiv6WUELQEPyE=; b=E482zJToeMHfb57pFJMJNcdVc4 OkPRQdeF0F29KHvdM3aznTUcM8vcqEpl3S6JZ5bnUnW2Q0r3pQlNDCEITPPo5SfM dwtRX5pYLsR0xTdVNGDiAP8l5oFekWzHJ5QQN4MGLsWtUBMr6X9xq+olTjmaQEU8 FBq5MIRFVc8ycgzmFTDOOFdcGTHOZzunLGZQzyeJ6vOGV0AcPxHgbKw8i1WxyHlc HceXMuy0enWNPsvKsvCVLiPEJPJBHQflTlSISnsupJV+8fCtwej8qwyfL1ApZQv9 w/orqTVVMkQhIxDPjk68qZoQCLvKNenYCsxrVbnoP4/4khOXG9v1cA03r53g== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:date:date:feedback-id :feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:references:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to :x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s= fm3; t=1666686935; x=1666773335; bh=GNlRW5rONjaUWYIksdqCAEkPGod9 bPOiv6WUELQEPyE=; b=lBGqg1aCk2NX0tuimGrg5YYhdZk6AeOesIAYURm74Dac kUdbEOv3gwCJfvkXUx+YaNaBqocve9/6BSPmyQuxquoU2UjhL45iUlh33iZ/C1L1 VAdlNpZgtQf/CD4oPGHxicKGbnEFBwlicUHgNo7xWbo9J7Q31KOJuIUzN83U09ZC J59U6Q5QmIvqwMNoIVZ7GU/KgBIMKwTe20dNfAvdYPhBnowj2cEzJo8Qygc7hWTT tff++qiqwZqsOYHqMBCiGG3pmva8h9EEcJHJ/YDo2vgBcZRPtL4JF5Sp0QhzexiV 1XKQOT00Tkk+mBpHM47XKUWjAJswl5oQy3p2vpSbRA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvfedrgedtiedgtdehucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpeffhffvuffkfhggtggujgesthdtre dttddtvdenucfhrhhomheptehnghgvlhhoucfrrghpvghnhhhofhhfuceorggrphesphgr phhnvghtrdgvuheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepgffhuefgieetuedvgffhudegvdetle fhfffhvedtfedufedvteeutedutedugedvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfr rghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomheprggrphesphgrphhnvghtrdgvuh X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i47c14439:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for ; Tue, 25 Oct 2022 04:35:35 -0400 (EDT) Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2022 10:35:32 +0200 From: Angelo Papenhoff To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society Message-ID: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Message-ID-Hash: SVB46VUODAZZXZLVTDPL3NQPK46GMCFO X-Message-ID-Hash: SVB46VUODAZZXZLVTDPL3NQPK46GMCFO X-MailFrom: aap@papnet.eu X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; header-match-tuhs.tuhs.org-0; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: who invented the link register List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On 25/10/22, Angelo Papenhoff wrote: > Might be earlier than this, I just happen to know the Whirlwind somewhat > well. It's late 40s machine, so you probably won't find anything *much* > older. Addendum: the original report from 1947 does not describe this behaviour yet. The change came in oct. 1948. M-668 mentions it and refers to M-647, which however is not available online. So the concept of saving the resturn address in another register is at least as old as oct. 1948, but again I wouldn't be surprised if some even slightly earlier computer had it too. aap