From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 11516 invoked from network); 3 Mar 2023 23:00:28 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (2600:3c01:e000:146::1) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 3 Mar 2023 23:00:28 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C30224128D; Sat, 4 Mar 2023 09:00:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from lechuck.jsg.id.au (jsg.id.au [193.114.144.202]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FE0A4128C for ; Sat, 4 Mar 2023 09:00:14 +1000 (AEST) Received: from largo.jsg.id.au (largo.jsg.id.au [192.168.1.43]) by lechuck.jsg.id.au (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPS id b81d33bb (TLSv1.3:TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256:NO); Sat, 4 Mar 2023 10:00:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (largo.jsg.id.au [local]) by largo.jsg.id.au (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTPA id 7cbfebae; Sat, 4 Mar 2023 10:00:11 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Sat, 4 Mar 2023 10:00:11 +1100 From: Jonathan Gray To: Noel Chiappa Message-ID: References: <20230303182200.B951918C08D@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20230303182200.B951918C08D@mercury.lcs.mit.edu> Message-ID-Hash: 7YZY7A36ZNXZEFWJ6GDD2OIZLHJKMM3E X-Message-ID-Hash: 7YZY7A36ZNXZEFWJ6GDD2OIZLHJKMM3E X-MailFrom: jsg@jsg.id.au X-Mailman-Rule-Misses: dmarc-mitigation; no-senders; approved; emergency; loop; banned-address; member-moderation; nonmember-moderation; administrivia; implicit-dest; max-recipients; max-size; news-moderation; no-subject; digests; suspicious-header CC: tuhs@tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 3.3.6b1 Precedence: list Subject: [TUHS] Re: Unix v7 icheck dup problem List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list Archived-At: List-Archive: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 01:22:00PM -0500, Noel Chiappa wrote: > > From: KenUnix > > > So is it safe to say there is no fsck or similar for v7? > > There was a version of 'fcheck' (are 'fsck' and 'fcheck' the same program?) > for V7, but I don't know if it's available. It would be really easy to > convert the 'fcheck.c' that I put up to a V7 version; the V6 and V7 file > systems are almost identical, except for the block size, I think. https://www.tuhs.org/Archive/Distributions/Research/v7addenda.tar.gz https://www.tuhs.org/cgi-bin/utree.pl?file=V7addenda/fsck