On Monday, 4 November 2024 at 10:35:40 -0700, Marc Rochkind wrote: > Many opinions of the evidence, especially on Groklaw, but also > elsewhere, including here. But none of these people offering > opinions have really seen the evidence, I think that depends on what SCO (and when) claimed as evidence. They did present slides of obfuscated code (replacing ASCII with Greek letters in the assumption that nobody could recognize the original and maybe that the code was too precious to show in the orignal). I can't find that any more, and maybe its on one of the many dead links on http://www.lemis.com/grog/SCO/. But http://www.lemis.com/grog/SCO/code-comparison.php refers to it and identifies the errors in the claims. > Mostly people talk about "evidence " offered by Darl at the > start. But NONE of the actual evidence came from him. It was > researched by a team of expert witnesses on both sides, of which I > was one. I'd be very interested to hear what else they presented. Did your conclusions agree with mine? Greg -- Sent from my desktop computer. Finger grog@lemis.com for PGP public key. See complete headers for address and phone numbers. This message is digitally signed. If your Microsoft mail program reports problems, please read http://lemis.com/broken-MUA.php