From: scj@yaccman.com (scj@yaccman.com)
Subject: [TUHS] Make love
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 19:42:30 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a0849a67fc17435f62770a93a402c99e.squirrel@webmail.yaccman.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <B35FEBE0-B939-4CDE-8C9F-FFE938DF6867@bsdimp.com>
Early Unix had a lot of cryptic messages -- the infamous "eh?", and "very
funny!" were two that I got several times. The make love message in the
earliest make I remember was "Don't know how to make love."
When working on PCC, I had the unenviable job of producing a C compiler
that would accept all of *077532 = 13, 077532->ack = 13, and device->ack
= 13. As we were trying to get the kernel and applications to declare
addresses more "honestly", we adopted a rule that if you actually used a
structure reference that was type safe, we would require it everywhere in
the file. Since structure members used to be in a single namespace, this
led to some horribly complicated code. In an effort to get it to work, I
festooned it with consistency checks nearly every other line, getting more
and more punchy as I tried to come up with short, unique messages.
I'll never forget the look on Ken's face when he came to me and asked
"what is a 'gummy structure'?"
Nowadays, while I'm happy to have some fun with them, I think throwing
humor at people who have just screwed up is playing to a tough audience.
Today, I might have suggested that 'make love' produce something more like
"Don't know how to make love. Can you introduce me to a hot makefile?"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-01 2:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-31 17:23 Norman Wilson
2015-07-31 21:05 ` Warner Losh
2015-07-31 23:48 ` John Cowan
2015-08-01 3:48 ` Larry McVoy
2015-08-01 2:42 ` scj [this message]
2015-08-02 1:35 ` Mary Ann Horton
2015-08-02 9:45 ` arnold
2015-08-10 17:51 ` scj
2015-08-01 3:20 ` Dave Horsfall
2015-08-01 3:36 ` Steve Nickolas
2015-08-01 11:19 ` Milo Velimirovic
2015-08-01 11:28 ` Milo Velimirovic
2015-08-01 3:50 ` Larry McVoy
2015-08-01 4:53 ` Steve Nickolas
2015-08-01 17:02 ` Clem cole
2015-08-01 17:04 ` Clem cole
2015-08-01 7:21 ` Warner Losh
2015-08-01 11:16 ` Ronald Natalie
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2015-08-01 11:03 Norman Wilson
2015-07-31 0:16 Nemo
2015-07-30 21:11 Norman Wilson
2015-07-30 20:00 Dave Horsfall
2015-07-30 20:03 ` John Cowan
2015-07-31 16:32 ` ron
2015-07-31 16:39 ` John Cowan
2015-07-30 20:37 ` Ori Idan
2015-07-30 20:45 ` Chet Ramey
2015-07-30 20:51 ` Jaap Akkerhuis
2015-07-31 16:09 ` random832
2015-07-31 16:40 ` Warner Losh
2015-07-31 17:00 ` Ed Skinner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a0849a67fc17435f62770a93a402c99e.squirrel@webmail.yaccman.com \
--to=scj@yaccman.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).