From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: (qmail 26203 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2020 14:19:39 -0000 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (45.79.103.53) by inbox.vuxu.org with UTF8ESMTPZ; 29 Apr 2020 14:19:39 -0000 Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id A441F9C9A8; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:19:31 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C0E059C95C; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:19:03 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; secure) header.d=mxes.net header.i=@mxes.net header.b="EHmWrwSg"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 1C4DB9C917; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:19:01 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp-out-4.mxes.net (smtp-out-4.mxes.net [198.205.123.69]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA5C79C841 for ; Thu, 30 Apr 2020 00:18:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from squirrelmail.mxes.net (squirrelmail.mxes.net [198.205.123.113]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EB1F575981; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:18:57 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mxes.net; s=mta; t=1588169938; bh=JUq6mhJijAb8Oa0JEXK3XnCSz1YbMoDJiuYbafukNUM=; h=Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Subject:From:To: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=EHmWrwSgHfH9KSrcQSbNyZGwvS/KszHMesamv8AdE8niekhbCk+AG1J+aRf30SF7K Tl1h2rf9UCuERA+ggGNCGhxP5t94wNRNaEPICZjY961SWSt8LBC7XKh+VcAwKBLp58 ingSC69fCK3MGKGjBH8NXP6jBW3i9XhA/7xC2O2I= Received: from squirrelmail.tuffmail.net (squirrelmail.mxes.net [198.205.123.113]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by squirrelmail.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1BE5475AF0; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:18:57 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <9A1BF33E-49C9-4712-BF25-4C0BBC504CD1@planet.nl> References: <9A1BF33E-49C9-4712-BF25-4C0BBC504CD1@planet.nl> Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:18:57 -0400 From: ron@ronnatalie.com To: "Paul Ruizendaal" User-Agent: SquirrelMail/1.4.23 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain;charset=utf-8 X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Importance: Normal Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Sent-To: Subject: Re: [TUHS] as(1) on Ultrix-11 vs 2.11BSD X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" Thanks for the link. With that help, I fixed the bug in the program: mov $6., -(sp) mov $1f, -(sp) mov $1,-(sp) mov $0,-(sp) sys 4 add $8., sp mov $0,-(sp) mov $0,-(sp) sys 1 1: >> Sorry, I typed that in haste without testing. I don=E2=80=99t have a 2= .11 system >> to try it on. However, reading the source code, I did that wrong. The >> args go on the stack, not in line with the code. >> mov $6, -(sp) >> mov a, -(sp) >> mov $1,-(sp) >> sys 4 > > Without suggesting that every helpful post should be tested, I find the > superb https://unix50.org web emulator excellent for such things. > > Many thanks to the folks hosting & maintaining this great resource! > >