From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.6 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HTML_MESSAGE,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 1fa4062c for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 04:23:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 7C6B89BCC5; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:23:26 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2F09BC42; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:23:01 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: minnie.tuhs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com header.i=@outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com header.b="fZDqTGSj"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 9B55A9BC42; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:22:59 +1000 (AEST) Received: from KOR01-SL2-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-eopbgr1290084.outbound.protection.outlook.com [40.107.129.84]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2BF599BC35 for ; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 14:22:58 +1000 (AEST) ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; s=arcselector9901; d=microsoft.com; cv=none; b=PcYnhx8pFvayroK0Aw3T/tWch3GcQoWWyrcRsrTaKkLeh+hMH7itD+AsdjhA5Rag5ozKfeg0TyPvnnty/bgtnK1UJkJ8J7xJAoJiREpzgTalu/IzGYaKwkHYtbtP5nt0B8dIz2s714eQfZeAxtL1wkRtlwSchT4556Zyoq6gFqZZqRovM7I3Zhxm8HDQHhlVKPtrU3qqHgxdSnW6THoihmr+eRKzsLIpKTiput8tjTjC4FCUNluZS8UL5vaWqrPjU1fDhN7xmApcqKGVZ4PsDjQ2JFVUD34WNUKe0q8EBiQCXu6Cggy/UJvbZkEHOs1xfpOnU8BGo78ggrxs9FaVow== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=microsoft.com; s=arcselector9901; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YhD8znCXotUY0TQIkZkimWzh5kjeGwUab8Z3RZEJN9k=; b=K3BaQGkCnSP9l81fDufAPV9KE53HMPyR440Le+78mbsaYvIkwPgdDFOkRc8HOPqIlFOLmuxISCzA42FYMy+mhx/SvEFKOm/zKRAaZOypnKZxQI5HEc0bUvQaGcjXHn1JFtO4c6a8utRu/IQj7s1uGRwWrqqEFjn121GDV+DWjGEzK1h0Udrn0Z9ECo52MS9xZ65ertCSzrphULPbm8wRtk0pdmK7e917TPBxhTzCsJp2JsgPv5nzfzenDWXAV7fVNV3EpZfvzj6TN5NS6JAu654kP8Bgp663UQSxzwzIbTNKDU+HAmWqlueBdeLOCN/1MIInGhVEHlMjPzB51m778Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx.microsoft.com 1; spf=fail (sender ip is 59.148.14.54) smtp.rcpttodomain=gmail.com smtp.mailfrom=superglobalmegacorp.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=superglobalmegacorp.com; dkim=none (message not signed); arc=none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=outdoorexpressionslimited.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector2-outdoorexpressionslimited-onmicrosoft-com; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version:X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck; bh=YhD8znCXotUY0TQIkZkimWzh5kjeGwUab8Z3RZEJN9k=; b=fZDqTGSj5MTJXmfLJ4hSqaHV6cVb0VZGi3Q2+9MMfeMG4LLDDgfl/Yo1AROcTMyFph5tEKxMInxOjWYjVdNWgX7hlW3JZROKE8kp+crPvUHMy8sun5vG++cipFUQf4PMDfBtVOvboQd6kSSvlkZgQ05ESUv0TH77foMI1bxYXSQ= Received: from TY2PR02CA0065.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:404:e2::29) by PS2PR02MB4037.apcprd02.prod.outlook.com (2603:1096:300:5f::21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2199.20; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 04:22:54 +0000 Received: from PU1APC01FT025.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com (2a01:111:f400:7ebd::204) by TY2PR02CA0065.outlook.office365.com (2603:1096:404:e2::29) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2199.14 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 04:22:54 +0000 Authentication-Results: spf=fail (sender IP is 59.148.14.54) smtp.mailfrom=superglobalmegacorp.com; gmail.com; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;gmail.com; dmarc=none action=none header.from=superglobalmegacorp.com; Received-SPF: Fail (protection.outlook.com: domain of superglobalmegacorp.com does not designate 59.148.14.54 as permitted sender) receiver=protection.outlook.com; client-ip=59.148.14.54; helo=exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local; Received: from exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local (59.148.14.54) by PU1APC01FT025.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.152.252.237) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 15.20.2199.13 via Frontend Transport; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 04:22:52 +0000 Received: from [IPv6:::ffff:192.168.1.10] (192.168.1.10 [192.168.1.10]) by exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2657.72) id NPGTFH8W; Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:22:51 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Henry Bent , Angelo Papenhoff From: Jason Stevens Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:22:51 +0800 Importance: normal X-Priority: 3 In-Reply-To: References: <13c5c36e-c84d-e020-d09e-51c8c502dc6d@kilonet.net> <75a32043-4830-ba04-ee0f-023c5f5ade3f@gmail.com> <20190827003013.GS13570@mcvoy.com> <20190827160559.GA92491@indra.papnet.eu> Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_DC873F38-5260-4684-A572-AD14730FEEF6_" Message-ID: X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:59.148.14.54; IPV:CAL; CTRY:HK; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(136003)(39830400003)(396003)(346002)(2980300002)(1110001)(339900001)(199004)(189003)(446003)(5660300002)(11346002)(105606002)(26826003)(508600001)(229853002)(9686003)(54896002)(74316002)(6306002)(6246003)(2906002)(336012)(236005)(356004)(4326008)(70206006)(70586007)(110136005)(36906005)(316002)(31696002)(76176011)(8676002)(81156014)(486006)(126002)(81166006)(16586007)(8936002)(71190400001)(81686011)(76130400001)(53546011)(476003)(33964004)(26005)(186003)(86362001)(31686004); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:PS2PR02MB4037; H:exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local; FPR:; SPF:Fail; LANG:en; PTR:059148014054.ctinets.com; A:1; MX:1; X-MS-PublicTrafficType: Email X-MS-Office365-Filtering-Correlation-Id: cdfa049e-d1d7-4d39-4398-08d72b6f64c2 X-Microsoft-Antispam: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(2390118)(7020095)(4652040)(7021145)(8989299)(4534185)(7022145)(4603075)(4627221)(201702281549075)(8990200)(7048125)(7024125)(7027125)(7023125)(5600166)(711020)(4605104)(1401327)(2017052603328); SRVR:PS2PR02MB4037; X-MS-TrafficTypeDiagnostic: PS2PR02MB4037: X-Microsoft-Antispam-PRVS: X-MS-Oob-TLC-OOBClassifiers: OLM:8882; X-Forefront-PRVS: 014304E855 X-MS-Exchange-SenderADCheck: 1 X-Microsoft-Antispam-Message-Info: uKQRyXPCv2NoTixhfSOBOYCdi5dXSFUaLmy4JbhffyTFqkyEX8xONPZufP+FJtTC9wwtugyJOV9YwZfGZEcyt7W4+m9C+xluQUxAymuC0SEgjIuQRXBGfmHY5KkKgyCyZyKS9+yeIn/CD7L4TXgT1RZo8siyv7nzbyXI1FrT7dGzaVWqioUhuOUf0oV5BvnzBJ2Ydyo9MJGbhkuwwsNBXZ6ju9AwkO/iyXCJHMJMJJVNfptJIZ4SNKoAXORgudkldcjouo9f4tjWFtxJfMbeVQau4ORclAzN8Px95BHXTIW/ddX7oWQeVfpqNPhQ0SjC8LWTkFrq+J6SJ4S17wmtUkFoNXAF1/vy9yTQpkU6vuCCemezBOd2au+qbVVyDoe2orTDObGbRXip0u8nshG8juMYRxDjrGjlRUXJQ9A2K8w= X-OriginatorOrg: superglobalmegacorp.com X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Aug 2019 04:22:52.4278 (UTC) X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: cdfa049e-d1d7-4d39-4398-08d72b6f64c2 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Id: 870ed452-0577-4b7b-90ed-9cac080031b9 X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-OriginalAttributedTenantConnectingIp: TenantId=870ed452-0577-4b7b-90ed-9cac080031b9; Ip=[59.148.14.54]; Helo=[exchange.superglobalmegacorp.local] X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-FromEntityHeader: HybridOnPrem X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: PS2PR02MB4037 Subject: Re: [TUHS] Running v10 X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.26 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: TUHS main list Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" --_DC873F38-5260-4684-A572-AD14730FEEF6_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" I don=E2=80=99t recall their being detailed installation instructions like = v8/v9. I never noticed the vax boot stuff as it was buried in the tree. I= t=E2=80=99s possible that it=E2=80=99s buildable. Or it could be incomplet= e like the Mach 2.5 VAX missing system headers=E2=80=A6. I guess it=E2=80=99s worth trying on whatever should be the parallel BSD sy= stem if it=E2=80=99s like v8/v9 which needed a BSD machine to bootstrap. From: Henry Bent Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 12:28 AM To: Angelo Papenhoff Cc: TUHS main list Subject: Re: [TUHS] Running v10 On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 12:12, Angelo Papenhoff wrote: Did anyone try to get v10 running in simh yet? It's been public for a while now and while we have two blit emulators already I haven't seen v10 alive yet. I have to admit I haven't tried to get it running myself eit= her. After a brief look at the boot and config sources it appears as though ther= e is support for the MicroVAX II which SIMH supports and I have used.=C2=A0= Is there an environment which is preferred for building the V10 source tre= e?=C2=A0 4.3BSD?=C2=A0 V8?=C2=A0 Something else? -Henry On 27/08/19, Rob Pike wrote: > I always thought Research 10th Edition was fantastic. Even the 8th editio= n > was an improvement on most of its successors. But things flowed another > way, with muddy streams mixing in. --_DC873F38-5260-4684-A572-AD14730FEEF6_ Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"

I don=E2=80=99t recall their being d= etailed installation instructions like v8/v9.=C2=A0 I never noticed the vax= boot stuff as it was buried in the tree.=C2=A0 It=E2=80=99s possible that = it=E2=80=99s buildable.=C2=A0 Or it could be incomplete like the Mach 2.5 V= AX missing system headers=E2=80=A6.

 

I guess it=E2=80=99s worth trying on whatever sh= ould be the parallel BSD system if it=E2=80=99s like v8/v9 which needed a B= SD machine to bootstrap.

 

From: Henry Be= nt
Sent: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 12:28 AM
To: Angelo Papenhoff
Cc: TUHS main list
Subject: Re: = [TUHS] Running v10

 

=

On Tue, 27 Aug 2019 at 12:12, Angelo Papenhoff &l= t;aap@papnet.eu> wrote:

Did anyone try to get v10 running in simh yet? It's been public for a
w= hile now and while we have two blit emulators already I haven't seen
v10= alive yet. I have to admit I haven't tried to get it running myself either= .

 

After a brief look at the boot and config sources it = appears as though there is support for the MicroVAX II which SIMH supports = and I have used.  Is there an environment which is preferred for build= ing the V10 source tree?  4.3BSD?  V8?  Something else?

<= /div>

 

-Henry

 

On 27/08/19= , Rob Pike wrote:
> I always thought Research 10th Edition was fantas= tic. Even the 8th edition
> was an improvement on most of its success= ors. But things flowed another
> way, with muddy streams mixing in.

 

= --_DC873F38-5260-4684-A572-AD14730FEEF6_--