From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: usotsuki@buric.co (Steve Nickolas)
Date: Mon, 27 Jun 2016 12:35:44 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [TUHS] Origin year of BSD csh?
In-Reply-To: <20160627162237.GB3353@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <201606261014.u5QAE1qX015184@skeeve.com>
 <5770032F.8030306@mhorton.net> <20160626181450.GK26734@mcvoy.com>
 <18119E4C-CE7E-44BD-B2D2-D7B32850238F@ronnatalie.com>
 <20160627112732.GA8110@autechre4> <20160627162237.GB3353@mercury.ccil.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.02.1606271234470.50568@frieza.hoshinet.org>

On Mon, 27 Jun 2016, John Cowan wrote:

> Sven Mascheck scripsit:
>
>>    3.  History.  It seems to me that the csh history mechanism is
>>        mostly a response to the deficiencies of UNIX terminal I/O.
>>        Those of you running 4.2 BSD should try out atty (which I am
>>        posting to the net at the same time as ash) and see if you
>>        still want history."
>
> I personally could not live without !!, ^foo^bar, !foo, etc.

Same.

That's a big reason why I still use bash even though ksh is faster and 
lighter and otherwise works just as well.

-uso.