From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: usotsuki@buric.co (Steve Nickolas)
Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2017 02:01:04 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [TUHS] Mach for i386 / Mt Xinu or other
In-Reply-To: <1ba0f584-6478-4332-bcae-63ac6cedf2f6@SG2APC01FT041.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com>
References: <CAMYpm84Z7SLWZmBgz4X4SVAOGw2wHdMYQ2avq4kcMACU0M-ZxA@mail.gmail.com>
 <1c400c16-5f18-4475-a8e2-99976e571a37@SG2APC01FT039.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com>
 <CAH1jEzYFv6bfN9i8qSSpy4dJhGg-WbZsyvVwxXro4dd4_RgCgw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAMYpm851jyAUG271r4431fv8pvPhqB2ufM9OafAUzwpx+kVSEg@mail.gmail.com>
 <635c06b4-0048-4951-95ca-283c64c30fed@SG2APC01FT017.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com>
 <CAC20D2NStqm47mfSFUvtVaLZfB-cdWUfc7r4RoZBWUp4fTmaOw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJfiPzz3Wvvgye0rRjZG4HAGWLU3ZtpGnii3KOBzOWkV4r5zvg@mail.gmail.com>
 <1ba0f584-6478-4332-bcae-63ac6cedf2f6@SG2APC01FT041.eop-APC01.prod.protection.outlook.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.02.1702190200300.94021@frieza.hoshinet.org>

On Sun, 19 Feb 2017, jsteve at superglobalmegacorp.com wrote:

> True, but It’s not 4.3 BSD … I was hoping for something vintage of the 
> era, just as Solaris 11 is SYSV, but it’s nothing like SYSVr2 on the 
> VAX….
>
> And historical is far more interesting than something I can just go buy 
> retail….  Speaking as someone who’s own a NeXT, and even bought OS X 
> Server 1.0 on release.

Isn't Jolix essentially Reno, if a 4.3BSD is what you're after?

-uso.