From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: usotsuki@buric.co (Steve Nickolas)
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 20:48:59 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [TUHS] The size of EMACS, and what hides in kLOCs
In-Reply-To: <CAJfiPzwpjk12WC6HpCJH1eY-42T4WeGmiLjfsFC3Lf0GZCMW6w@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAJfiPzzDKemjamKHP8rpC3j-hW_K3NY-D7oQ3D0k8DGzUpk+pg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALMnNGg3dRV0yPV1GgeqaOFG0Mb5PSNuqgPs8pLKOHYzurYEOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJfiPzwpjk12WC6HpCJH1eY-42T4WeGmiLjfsFC3Lf0GZCMW6w@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.02.1702262048390.56395@frieza.hoshinet.org>

On Sun, 26 Feb 2017, Nemo wrote:

> On 26 February 2017 at 12:28, Andy Kosela <andy.kosela at gmail.com> wrote:
> [...]
>> Are you sure it was emacs?  Most probably it was pico, which was the default
>> editor for pine.  We used pine/pico for all email at our university in the
>> 90's.  It was wildly popular.
>
> Ah well, I am not sure -- that betrayed my emacs bias.  I saw ^X^C and
> assumed emacs.
>
> N.
>

Huh.  pico's exit is just ^X, not ^X^C.

-uso.