From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dave@horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall)
Date: Fri, 10 Mar 2017 13:51:54 +1100 (EST)
Subject: [TUHS] Help request: uucp, mail on 4.2BSD
In-Reply-To: <59797EE8-FAC3-4403-B9D1-109DA0CD5EB2@quintile.net>
References: <CAC20D2MCFBN4e=4j2B0L1=WchCVgEf7sVVv2KGNa4ECWjSSXgA@mail.gmail.com>
 <A8C2A67A-FC5F-41FB-A34C-B839D9FB3A52@xs4all.nl>
 <59797EE8-FAC3-4403-B9D1-109DA0CD5EB2@quintile.net>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1703101348460.2854@aneurin.horsfall.org>

On Fri, 10 Mar 2017, Steve Simon wrote:

> Maybe its the same one, but I remeber a special UUCP protocol which had 
> its MTU and timeouts carefully adjusted to get the best performance 
> across X25.

And there was yet another variation ("s"?) designed for satellite 
circuits.

-- 
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU)  "Those who don't understand security will suffer."