From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dave@horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 08:12:04 +1000 (EST)
Subject: [TUHS] The evolution of Unix facilities and architecture
In-Reply-To: <20170514125543.GA81508@cowbell.employees.org>
References: <20170513004423.F3A9C18C099@mercury.lcs.mit.edu>
 <1494636703.1615694.975085000.13626EAC@webmail.messagingengine.com>
 <8B3FFD9C-FA5F-434F-A18E-FF59215C6DDD@quintile.net>
 <CAC20D2NHZ0kzuGJmtBFxXwQSiT-33KiokV2Gi3pEyf6m5Nqp3A@mail.gmail.com>
 <1038e644-cef1-9424-f6fa-288941033bff@gmail.com>
 <20170514125543.GA81508@cowbell.employees.org>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1705150810220.67621@aneurin.horsfall.org>

On Sun, 14 May 2017, Derek Fawcus wrote:

> > to see DEC's internal boxes weren't running System/Manager, 
> > Field/Service and UETP/UETP User/password combinations.
> 
> Those default account combinations were still being used to gain access 
> to VMS systems in the '87-'89 time frame;  although user/password was 
> less interesting by itself, being an unpriviledged account.

Wasn't there also Guest/Guest as well?  Admittedly it would also be pretty 
boring, but nonetheless still a toe-hold.

-- 
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU)  "Those who don't understand security will suffer."