From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dave@horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall)
Date: Mon, 15 May 2017 15:01:58 +1000 (EST)
Subject: [TUHS] C declarations.
In-Reply-To: <20170515045416.AF1CF124AEA4@mail.bitblocks.com>
References: <015401d2caa0$79762650$6c6272f0$@ronnatalie.com>
 <68E8DC0A-D1B8-4FF0-AD26-ACDC57E308AF@pobox.com>
 <20170511223232.GM4341@mcvoy.com>
 <015b01d2caa7$c658c020$530a4060$@ronnatalie.com>
 <20170513012415.GZ4341@mcvoy.com>
 <025701d2cb92$ec8182a0$c58487e0$@ronnatalie.com>
 <20170513122050.GF9980@yeono.kjorling.se>
 <0CF82AC1-E835-4C06-813F-D9EFD2C12290@tfeb.org>
 <20170513124247.GG9980@yeono.kjorling.se>
 <57639684-050B-4995-859F-876CAFE4BE9C@serissa.com>
 <20170514042411.93CCB124AEA4@mail.bitblocks.com>
 <alpine.BSF.2.20.1705151433050.67621@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <20170515045416.AF1CF124AEA4@mail.bitblocks.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1705151500090.67621@aneurin.horsfall.org>

On Sun, 14 May 2017, Bakul Shah wrote:

> > Nope.
> > 
> >     aneurin% cdecl
> >     Type `help' or `?' for help
> >     explain int*()* f
> >     syntax error
> >     declare f as ptr to function returning ptr to int
> >     int *(*f)()
> 
> Sorry, I was less than clear.  I was just doing a thought
> experiment about an alternate declaration syntax.  Requoting
> from my email:

Sorry - entirely my fault (which I'd realised just *after* I'd sent it, of 
course).  Yes, your idea is a lot better.

-- 
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU)  "Those who don't understand security will suffer."