From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: dave@horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall)
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2017 10:54:12 +1000 (EST)
Subject: [TUHS] RFS was: Re: UNIX of choice these days?
In-Reply-To: <CAK7dMtCER7LZ+WmQNRNH-YwYspD6jL7W370Q67Vou0Rp+YWv=Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <c38ba7b5-e867-93a3-14a2-c61c90bb49b5@kilonet.net>
 <alpine.BSF.2.21.1709201036150.89458@aneurin.horsfall.org>
 <20170923091704.GD10152@darioniedermann.it>
 <CANuZA8QHNn=6Gg-Sm20s-0PSsS7y26c=uNbNETUX74Tx1A=DWQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CALMnNGgMSmqQ56r7xTRNdrDYfRiMieQ48kuZfWtSKd+yjmP2tg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAP6exYKxC2g06dSRiM8-0BLN08AEWyO-8a0VAcy3vP4H3-8o8A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC20D2MKSzQEfmD0dnKYv-0V00TkL6f_-Dv4Gs1diOrBLS8x3Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <b6e8b71c-ba04-bbfb-00db-c371ee62cdb8@kilonet.net>
 <CAC20D2PYANmz2=oWCHX6h3jM5bxFBbzQZHDZXP00idyw+fwDZw@mail.gmail.com>
 <201709270844.v8R8i2kd021180@freefriends.org>
 <CAK7dMtBkpreyncAoc-CPsUgFeMvQpdBEynX3pmS-8Z0KXn8Y1A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAC20D2NU6ErExdOuT6PNucf4VhuLKwW1=AcbaOdKtV3vocrFkg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAK7dMtCER7LZ+WmQNRNH-YwYspD6jL7W370Q67Vou0Rp+YWv=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.21.1709281053070.47452@aneurin.horsfall.org>

On Wed, 27 Sep 2017, Kevin Bowling wrote:
> I guess alternatively, what was interesting or neat, about RFS, if
> anything?  And what was bad?

Didn't it support remote devices?  Or am I thinking of something else?

-- 
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU)  "Those who don't understand security will suffer."