From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dave@horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall) Date: Mon, 2 Oct 2017 12:01:50 +1100 (EST) Subject: Mangled and non-mangled TUHS mail lists In-Reply-To: <20171001032536.GB31930@minnie.tuhs.org> References: <20171001032536.GB31930@minnie.tuhs.org> Message-ID: On Sun, 1 Oct 2017, Warren Toomey wrote: > The main TUHS list now: > - doesn't strip incoming DKIM headers > - doesn't alter the From: line > - doesn't alter the Subject: line > and hopefully will keep most mail systems happy. I was under the impression that the main list would remain as it was, and those with fussy clients would use the new one. > The alternative, "mangled", TUHS list: > - strips incoming DKIM headers > - alters the From: line > - alters the Subject: line to say [TUHS] > - puts in DKIM headers once this is done > and hopefully will keep most mail systems happy but in a different way. I really like seeing the "[TUHS]" tag (I can optically sort mailing lists) so I'll probably migrate, but I'll wait a bit for them to settle down. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."