From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dave@horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall) Date: Tue, 3 Oct 2017 11:51:20 +1100 (EST) Subject: Mangled and non-mangled TUHS mail lists In-Reply-To: References: <20171001032536.GB31930@minnie.tuhs.org> Message-ID: On Mon, 2 Oct 2017, David Ryskalczyk wrote: > For lists the alter the From: line, I prefer if they put the original > From: address in the Cc: line as that means a reply-all goes both to the > list and the originator. However I'm not sure whether this will cause > DKIM issues as well (I haven't dug deep enough). I really hate it when people use reply-all and are too lazy to edit the recipient list; I get my copy via the list, thank you, and I don't need my own personal copy as well (there's a reason for the Reply-To: header). -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."