From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: dave@horsfall.org (Dave Horsfall) Date: Wed, 4 Oct 2017 13:28:57 +1100 (EST) Subject: Mangled and non-mangled TUHS mail lists In-Reply-To: <20171003184919.1QJzu%steffen@sdaoden.eu> References: <20171001032536.GB31930@minnie.tuhs.org> <209ed252-49ff-aff4-dd0a-614397907418@tnetconsulting.net> <20171003140853.IrkS4%steffen@sdaoden.eu> <472d5571-8093-e02c-4478-a97accc8e632@tnetconsulting.net> <20171003184919.1QJzu%steffen@sdaoden.eu> Message-ID: On Tue, 3 Oct 2017, Steffen Nurpmeso wrote: > |I think that modifying the subject to add a tag is a perfectly valid > |thing. As such, provisions should make such modifications /possible/. > |Then leave the choice of doing so or not up to each list's > |administrator. > > As has happened recently. Sure. Except Warren did it backwards; he should've left the original list as it was, and migrated those with fussy clients to the new list. -- Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."