From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (minnie.tuhs.org [45.79.103.53]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 3a5d145c for ; Fri, 30 Nov 2018 22:59:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 69110A1F08; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 08:59:24 +1000 (AEST) Received: from minnie.tuhs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D7AEA1F12; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 08:59:04 +1000 (AEST) Received: by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix, from userid 112) id 0B58DA1F03; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 08:59:02 +1000 (AEST) Received: from viclamta17p.bpe.bigpond.com (viclamta17p.bpe.bigpond.com [203.38.21.81]) by minnie.tuhs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 18604A1F02 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 08:59:00 +1000 (AEST) Received: from smtp.telstra.com ([10.10.26.4]) by viclafep17p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au with ESMTP id <20181130225858.HNBX29790.viclafep17p-svc.bpe.nexus.telstra.com.au@smtp.telstra.com> for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 09:58:58 +1100 X-RG-Spam: Unknown X-RazorGate-Vade-Verdict: clean 0 X-RazorGate-Vade-Classification: clean X-RazorGate-Vade: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedtkedruddviedgtdelucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuuffpveftpgfvgffnuffvtfetnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurhepfffhvffujgfkfhgfgggtsehmtddtredtreejnecuhfhrohhmpeffrghvvgcujfhorhhsfhgrlhhluceouggrvhgvsehhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrgheqnecukfhppeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefnecurfgrrhgrmhephhgvlhhopegrnhgvuhhrihhnrdhhohhrshhfrghllhdrohhrghdpihhnvghtpeduuddtrddugedurdduleefrddvfeefpdhmrghilhhfrhhomhepoegurghvvgeshhhorhhsfhgrlhhlrdhorhhgqecuuefqffgjpeekuefkvffokffogfdprhgtphhtthhopeeothhuhhhssehtuhhhshdrohhrgheqnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-RG-VS-CLASS: clean Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (110.141.193.233) by smtp.telstra.com (9.0.019.26-1) id 5BB3FBB60A89D18D for tuhs@tuhs.org; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 09:58:58 +1100 Received: from aneurin.horsfall.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wAUMwvBg053111 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 09:58:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) Received: from localhost (dave@localhost) by aneurin.horsfall.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) with ESMTP id wAUMwtk3053108 for ; Sat, 1 Dec 2018 09:58:57 +1100 (EST) (envelope-from dave@horsfall.org) X-Authentication-Warning: aneurin.horsfall.org: dave owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2018 09:58:55 +1100 (EST) From: Dave Horsfall To: The Eunuchs Hysterical Society In-Reply-To: <68E43E9C-BD27-4DDB-93D1-AD82EBCA976A@cheswick.com> Message-ID: References: <7a632484-cdc7-7c59-7077-7a2c752045da@spamtrap.tnetconsulting.net> <4c36b2b2-76df-435f-27bc-e1feb0647f36@case.edu> <201811162113.wAGLDGiQ031455@darkstar.fourwinds.com> <201811191648.wAJGmqGd005247@darkstar.fourwinds.com> <20181129184845.GB18414@mcvoy.com> <68E43E9C-BD27-4DDB-93D1-AD82EBCA976A@cheswick.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.21.9999 (BSF 287 2018-06-16) X-GPG-Public-Key: http://www.horsfall.org/gpgkey.pub X-GPG-Fingerprint: 05B4 FFBC 0218 B438 66E0 587B EF46 7357 EF5E F58B X-Home-Page: http://www.horsfall.org/ X-Witty-Saying: "chmod 666 the_mode_of_the_beast" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="1483753691-1866093495-1543618737=:52810" Subject: Re: [TUHS] man-page style X-BeenThere: tuhs@minnie.tuhs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: The Unix Heritage Society mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: tuhs-bounces@minnie.tuhs.org Sender: "TUHS" This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. --1483753691-1866093495-1543618737=:52810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8BIT On Fri, 30 Nov 2018, WIlliam Cheswick wrote: > I supported email and upas for a number of years, including the {bitnet > | csnet | uucp | acsnet(?)} -> domain migration.  Like the proverbial > (and non-existent) boiling frog, this crept up on me: it was a mild > surprise to realize we were using the other stuff much any more. Err, why the query after ACSnet? We in Oz preferred it over UUCP, because it was far superior, with self-routing etc. -- Dave --1483753691-1866093495-1543618737=:52810--